Convincing
Proof That God Exists
THE BIBLE is a most remarkable
book. Its account of the origin of evil; its unparalleled record
of God's dealings with the nation of Israel; its searching message
through their prophets; its "good news" proclaimed by Jesus Christ
and his apostles; above all, its unerring analysis of the weaknesses
of human nature and its contrasting portrayal of the holiness, the
truth and the mercy of God, made especially plain in the person
of His Son -- all these are outstanding features found in no other
book in the world. They prompted Henry Rogers over 100 years ago
to declare: "The Bible is not such a book as man would have
written if he could, nor could have written if he would."
[In The Superhuman Origin of the Bible Deduced from Itself]
In other words, God is needed to explain its existence.
In
this short work we shall consider one of the Bible's unique features:
its prophecy. Now strictly prophecy is not just foretelling the
future. A prophet was one who "spoke for" another, a spokesman;
and prophecy was the message the prophet spoke on behalf of God.
But since Bible prophecy contains quite a lot of "prediction", or
foretelling future events, for our purpose here we shall take the
term in that sense.
Who
has the Power of Prophecy?
But first we must settle an important question: Does the Bible claim
that the power of prophecy belongs only to God and is a proof of
His authority?
To
this there is a decisive answer in the prophecy of Isaiah. In the
41st chapter God challenges the idols and the idol worshippers of
the day to prove that they possess divine powers. This is how He
does it:
"Produce
your cause, saith the Lord; bring forth your strong reasons, saith
the King of Jacob. Let them (the idols) bring them (the reasons)
forth, and declare unto us what shall happen: declare ye
the former things, what they be, that we may consider them, and
know the latter end of them; and shew us things to come .
. . (vv. 21-22, R.V.).
The
basis of this challenge is clear: the pagan worshippers claim that
their idols are gods. Very well; let them produce the proofs. And
the proofs demanded by God Himself are that the idols shall announce
future events, and also declare "the former things", that is, explain
how creation took place in the beginning. The point is made crystal
clear in the next verse:
"Declare
the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that
ye are gods . . . " (v.23).
Here
God Himself is asserting that to be able to foretell the future
would be a proof of Divine power. More than once in this part of
Isaiah's prophecy, God declares that He is the only one who has
this power, for only He is God; there is no other:
"Remember
the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else;
I am God, and there is none like me..." (46:9).
The
God of Israel is here declaring that there is no other worthy object
of worship but Himself; and goes on to assert the signs of His power
in these terms:
"...
declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times
things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand,
and I will do all my pleasure" (46:10).
Come
to think of it, whoever would dare to say, My counsel shall stand
except God? What man is there in the whole world who could say any
such thing? To carry it out needs Someone who not only knows future
events before they happen, but has the power to see that they take
place as He has decreed. In other words, to utter prophecy which
will inevitably come true, you need God. No other cause can explain
it.
The
New Testament makes the same claim. When Jesus was about to leave
his disciples, he promised them the help of the Holy Spirit in their
task of preaching the Gospel in the world. One of the effects of
this gift was to be: "He shall declare unto you the things that
are to come" (John 16:13); in other words, the disciples were
to be given a knowledge of future events. It is certainly implied
that without the special gift they could not have done this. Their
ability to declare the future was to be an evidence of the Divine
power they had been granted.
Again,
in the last book of the Bible, chapter 1, verse 1, it is declared
that God gave to Jesus Christ a revelation, "to shew unto his servants
the things which must shortly come to pass . . " (Revelation
1:1). The knowledge of the future came from God through Jesus; without
that revelation, His servants could have known nothing of it.
The
conclusion is clear: the Bible says quite definitely that the power
to foretell the future belongs to God alone.
Does
the Bible foretell the Future?
Well, we have only to examine history and our own experience to
realize that men of themselves have no knowledge at all of the future.
Why, we do not even know what will happen to us tonight, or tomorrow
on our way to work, let alone next year; or of what will happen
to the world in 100 years, to say nothing of in 2000 years! If men
had the slightest knowledge of the future, how many decisions would
have been different! How many accidents would have been avoided!
How many disasters would never have been allowed to take place!
How many wars would never have been started! The experience of our
own lives and of the history of men both convince us that mankind
has no sure knowledge at all of what is yet to be.
But
suppose the future has been foretold, not once, but many
times? And always in the same book, the Bible, and in no other book
in the world? Ought not that to make us sit up and take notice?
That is why we say that the prophecies of the Bible are most important;
they deserve to be carefully examined, for a great deal depends
on them. They are a striking sign that there exists in the world
a power greater than mankind.
"Yes,
but..."?
Those who do not believe that the Bible is the word of God do not
like its prophecy at all. Once grant that it has correctly foretold
the future and you have gone a long way to admitting the existence
of God. So they try to explain it away. "The prophecies", they say,
"were not really forecasts of the future at all -- they were written
after the events 'foretold'"
Now
this argument can only be made to appear to have any force if you
can prove that the Bible documents, especially those of the Old
Testament, were written a long time after the events they claim
to foretell. It must be stated clearly that they have no direct
evidence for this; the conclusion is the result of interpreting
the evidence to support their own theorizing. As a matter of fact,
all the research of the last 100 years tends to show that the Bible
documents are authentic: they really do belong to the age in which
they claim to be written.
But
there is a short cut in this matter which will do very well for
our present purpose. No one can deny that the Old Testament documents
were in existence by about 200 B.C., because they were being translated
into Greek about then [In what is called the Septuagint Version
of the Old Testament], and you cannot translate something that is
not there!
Another
objection is to say, "Well, these Bible 'prophecies' are really
clever political forecasts by people who could interpret the events
of their day and their likely outcome."
"Clever
political forecasts", issued in the centuries before Christ and
remaining true for over 2000 years to the present day? What sort
of wizards do they imagine the Bible prophets were to be able to
accomplish such feats? Merely to slate the matter thus is to show
how utterly improbable such an explanation of their words would
be.
But
the surest answer to this objection, as to all others, is to read
some of the prophecies themselves. So we begin with
PROPHECY
CONCERNING BABYLON
In
the days of the prophets of Israel (850-560 B.C. approximately)
two great military powers arose in the territory around the Euphrates
and the Tigris rivers, now known as Iraq. The earlier was the Empire
of Assyria, with Nineveh as its capital. During two centuries the
Assyrians carried out invasions of the territory of surrounding
nations: southwards they dominated the Chaldeans and their capital,
Babylon; eastwards they overran Syria, then advanced down the Mediterranean
coast, through Israel as far as Egypt. Their policy was one of terror.
Their aim was to terrorise local populations into submitting and
paying an annual tribute. To this end they sacked and burnt towns,
devastated the countryside, massacred the inhabitants and took thousands
away captive to Assyria.
The
second half of the 7th century B.C. saw the decline of Assyrian
power and the rise of the Babylonian. In 612 B.C. Nineveh was conquered.
Nebuchadnezzar, king of the Chaldeans, rapidly created the new empire.
The smaller nations of the Middle East, rejoicing over their deliverance
from Assyria, soon found themselves overrun by the armies of Babylon.
In particular Nebuchadnezzar overran Israel, sacked Jerusalem and
burnt its temple, and carried thousands away captive to Babylon.
He then went further south and invaded Egypt. The Babylonian Empire
was the second phase of this military domination arising from the
area of the Euphrates.
In
particular, Nebuchadnezzar, its greatest king, made the city of
Babylon a marvel in the world of the Near East. He built enormous
temples and palaces, and surrounded the city with an immense protective
wall. Babylon became the glory and pride both of Nebuchadnezzar
himself and his Chaldean people.
It
is difficult for us in these days to realize the impact of such
ruthless power and extravagant wealth upon the inhabitants of the
smaller nations. To them the empires of Assyria and Babylon must
have seemed terrifying and invincible.
Utterly
Overthrown
Yet 100 years before Babylon reached the height of its power, Isaiah
the prophet foretold its overthrow in very specific terms. In a
chapter headed "The burden of Babylon", this is what he said:
".
. . The day of the Lord is at hand; it shall come as a destruction
from the Almighty . . . Behold, I will stir up the Medes against
them . . . And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the
Chaldeans' pride, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.
It shall never be inhabited . . . neither shall the Arabian pitch
tent there; neither shall shepherds make their flocks to lie down
there. But wild beasts of the deserts shalt lie there" (Isaiah 13:6,17,19-21).
The
fate of Babylon is clear: the attackers are to be the Medes (a nation
to the east of Babylon); the city is to become a desolation, inhabited
by neither man nor beast. And let us remind ourselves that this
clear prophecy was uttered 100 years before Babylon arose to the
height of its power and glory.
Another
prophet, Jeremiah, writing 100 years later, when Nebuchadnezzar
was about to attack Jerusalem, added to the forecasts of Babylon's
downfall:
"Behold,
I will raise up against Babylon a destroying wind . . . Babylon
is suddenly fallen and destroyed . . . Prepare against (Babylon)
the nations, with the kings of the Medes . . . Babylon shall become
heaps (ruins), a dwellingplace for jackals, an astonishment and
an hissing, without inhabitant . . . The broad walls of Babylon
shall be utterly overthrown, and her high gates shall be burned
with fire . . . 0 Lord, thou hast spoken against this place to cut
it off, that none shall dwell therein, neither man nor beast, but
it shall be desolate for ever . . ."
And
finally the prophet is commanded to bind a stone to the roll of
the prophecy and to throw it into the river Euphrates, declaring,
"Thus
shall Babylon sink, and shall not rise again . . . " (Jeremiah 51:1,8,28,37,58,62-64).
The
agreement between the prophecies of Isaiah, written 100 years before
Babylon arose to power, and of Jeremiah, written when the empire
and city were at the height of their glory; is complete. To the
people of those days it must have sounded as it would to us if it
were prophesied that a great city like London, New York or Sydney
was to be destroyed and to remain a desolation for ever. In this
age of nuclear weapons such a fate would not be inconceivable; but
the prophets of Israel uttered their predictions over 2500 years
ago, long before anyone dreamed that such total destruction was
possible.
History
reveals how the prophecies about the fate of Babylon were progressively
fulfilled. The first despoilers were the Medes and the Persians
in the 6th century B.C. From that time the glory of Babylon began
to fade. Then came the Greeks under Alexander the Great, then the
Romans; after them various warlike tribes like the Parthians, the
Arabs and the Tartars. For centuries the actual site of the ancient
city of Babylon was a heap of ruins, shunned--so travelers tell
us--by wandering nomads. It was not until the archaeologists began
to explore the site in the first half of the 19th century that the
ruins of the great walls, the mighty temples and gates, and the
immense statues revealed to an astonished world how magnificent
ancient Babylon must have appeared in its day.
So
history reveals how Babylon, "the glory of kingdoms", became ruined
and deserted, just as the prophets of Israel said it would.
|