Symbols
in the sky
The great fires of the sun never go out. They burn with a surface
heat of six to seven thousand degrees, whilst the internal temperature
is considered to be approximately 50 million degrees. Of this
output energy, the earth receives but a minute part. If the earth
was any closer to the sun, the heat of the latter would destroy
us. If it were as close to the sun as the moon is to the earth,
the earth would disintegrate! But God's wisdom arranged that the
earth should be positioned where it is in order that it should
sustain life (Isaiah 45:18).
The
greatest works of man are puny compared to those of God. Supposing
a fog existed over Sydney Harbour (Australia) 90 metres deep,
the amount of air to be dissipated would be more than five million
tonnes. Man cannot devise means to disperse it; yet the sun,
the great dispeller of gloom and darkness, can accomplish the
work within an hour, and this is but a fraction of fog to be
shifted during each twenty-four hours.
Many
an astronomer has extolled the glory of the sun. Its surface
is called the Photosphere, because it gives out the light
which illuminates the earth. Under normal circumstances, it
seems to have a smooth surface but, actually, it has large waves
upon it, so that it has been described as a great ocean of fire.
Sun spots appear on the photosphere which are really great fiery
storms, during which tremendous hydrogen flames are cast out,
reaching over 300,000 kilometres. Near the edge of some of the
spots are bright ridges called faculae, which form the
most brilliant part of the sun, and are sometimes 65,000 kms
in length and 6,500 kms in breadth. Outside the photosphere
is the reversing layer consisting of cooler gases. Above this
is the Chromosphere, or color sphere, so called because
of its rose tint appearance. It extends to a depth of 6,500
kms. Beyond this is the marvellous white glory of the Corona.
It is a kind of rarefied atmosphere out of which emerges long,
slender, luminous filaments called streamers. Some have extended
to a distance of sixteen million kms in length. They were seen
at the time of total eclipse in 1878.
The
Bible likens the sun to a great fiery brazier of unparalleled
strength and splendour, whose fertilising rays bring life to
the world. In Psalm 19, David likened the sun to an army general
surrounded by his troops who do his summons; or to a bridegroom
appearing with glory and splendour, before the assembled gathering.
The sun's great heat, light and strength, reminded David of
a strong man running a race, and he saw it as a symbol of earth's
coming king, the Christ in whom his hopes were centred. David
was a "man after God's own heart," to whom God made promises
of eternal import (see 2 Samuel 7:12,13; Isaiah 55:7), and he
loved to contemplate the omnipotence and omniscience of the
Creator as revealed in His works. He declared: "The works
of God are great, sought out of all them that take delight therein"
(Psalms 111:2).
The glory, strength, fiery heat, revealing light, dominating
power, and life-giving properties of the sun are used as symbols
of the Lord Jesus. He is represented as coming to the earth
"as the great Sun of righteousness with healing in his
beams" (Malachi 4:2). His glory will commence a new
epoch, a "new day" for the earth, when he shall shine in the
political heavens as King of kings (2 Samuel 23:4). His rays
of spiritual light will disperse the gloom and evil of this
Gentile night and irradiate the world with divine Truth (Isaiah
60:1-3). He will come as a bridegroom to his waiting bride (Revelation
19:7), and she comprises all those who have earnestly sought
to live in accordance with his precepts in anticipation of his
coming, and, joined to him in immortality they will live and
reign upon the earth in glorious unity (Revelation 5:9-10; John
17:20-21). Christ will be "a strong man to run a race"
(Psalm 19:5), for he will cast down all opposing kings and rule
over the earth in righteousness (Daniel 7:27). Then shall all
men praise him, for the nation and kingdom that will not
serve him shall perish" (Isaiah 60:12). In the effulgence
of his spiritual light and understanding there shall be dispelled
the fog and "gross darkness" that encompasses
mankind today, and by his revelation of divine Truth men will
be forced to exclaim: "Surely our fathers (spiritual,
political and scientific!) have inherited lies, vanity,
and things wherein there is no profit" (Jeremiah 16:19).
The
Evolutionist caught in a Fly-Trap!
Simply put, evolution can be defined as the developing of new
and complex forms of life, from simpler forms by natural
processes rather than specific creation. God is thus replaced
by Nature; and evolutionists claim that all the amazing diversities
of life on the earth do not speak of His wonderful creative
Power, but of the remarkable vicissitudes of chance!
To
see how absurd this teaching is, examine carefully God's handiwork
in the insect-devouring "Venus Fly Trap," found in North
Carolina, USA, and consider whether this is an evidence of wonderful
design at the hand of an intelligent Creator, or of blind chance
working through amazing luck!
A -- flower
B -- plant
C,D,E -- trap in action.
1. Leaves of basal rosette each with terminal trap.
2. Trap.
3. Fly on leaf.
4. Contact hairs that set off trap: closing mechanism.
5. Teeth that close the trap. |
From
the accompanying drawings, identify the different parts of the
flower, and consider how the trap works. The leaves (see sketch
B1) of this plant lie in a "rosette" flat on the ground.
Each leaf ends in a leaf-blade that looks and acts like a steel
trap. The two halves of the trap, hinged in the middle, are
attractive on top, being colored pink, red or green, and having
the lure of flowers. But there are three little "triggers" (sensitive
hairs -- see sketch C4) on the upper inner surface of
each side of the trap, making a total of six "triggers" for
each trap.
Insects
land on these traps and walk around in search of nectar. When an
insect disturbs the sensitive hairs on the trap, it will instantly
snap shut, with tooth-edges meshing and preventing escape (see sketch
E). These six sensitive hairs even distinguish between a
living and a dead object, for the leaf-trap will not close unless
two hairs are touched in succession, or the same hair twice.
Small sticks or pebbles will leave the trap undisturbed!
Once
shut, however, the trap gradually pinches tighter and tighter, squeezing
its prey against the digestive glands on the inner surfaces of the
trap. These traps are strong enough to crush soft bodies, while
the glands secrete an acid that can digest any insect caught.
The
glands are able to give a continual supply of acid for a week once
a victim has been ensnared. When the trap closes, functions are
set in motion which virtually turn it into a "stomach."
This
plant, with its many traps, is designed to work in unison with co-operative
sequence. This is obviously the rational design of an intelligent
Creator.
Consider
again the various parts of the trap, two leaves, the hinges, the
toothed edges, the "trigger" hairs, the digestive glands, the copious
acid secretion at the right time. How could random chance, without
intelligent design, produce such an organization? It is impossible.
The theory of evolution is revealed to be absurd in attempting to
show how the Venus Fly Trap evolved. In fact, in trying to do so,
the evolutionist is himself caught in a fly trap!
Consider
the alternative. The parts of the trap either "evolved" one after
the other over millions of years -- or God created the plant! The
evolutionist claims that it took millions of years for the trap
to evolve, but, until the whole plant is completely formed, it won't
work! In other words, for millions of years the plant has been evolving
a trap that won't work! Fortunately, the plant has no brains,
otherwise it surely would have destroyed itself in sheer frustration!
But though it lacks brains, apparently, according to the evolutionist,
it went on busily evolving away over millions of years, attempting
the impossible, trying to make an incomplete trap work until, supposedly
at one stage, a particularly bright plant, by superhuman effort
(we won't use the word "miracle"), suddenly thought out (without
brains, mind you) what was required and proceeded to grow it!
Please
excuse the sarcasm in our description, but how else can evolution
account for this amazing plant! There is only one way that plant
could come into being: by specific creation.
Look
at it again. Notice that the flower is separate from the trap which
is situated at the end of the leaf. Any variations in the shape
of leaves are not handed on to its offspring, unless they are transferred
to the seeds. Can the flower do this itself? Of course not! The
alternative is for the evolutionist to "suppose" that somehow evolution
takes place inside the seed itself.
Now
consider what these so-called scientists are asking you to believe.
They ask you to accept that the intricate insect trap, with all
its functions is the result of "changes" inside the microscopic
cell from which the seed is developed, and that during this evolutionary
period these changes were useless (for the trap would not work),
and therefore they were "evolved" for no apparent reason!
The
cell, itself, is made up of many complex parts and substances, the
most intriguing being the chromosomes and genes. The former are
the tiny ribbons of proteins and nucleic acids that dictate growth
and heredity, thus determining the shape and function of the whole
plant.
What
possible "natural forces" could work in a cell, whose fluid interest
is in an almost continual state of upheaval, in order to influence
those tiny ribbons of protein, so that when the cell reproduces
itself millions of times, a "Venus Fly Trap" is formed on the
edges of each leaf to catch insects and any other small creatures
around?
Obviously,
the theory of evolution dispenses with reason and truth, and substitutes
absurdity; but what is more serious, it dispenses with the need
of a Creator in the marvellous living things around us, seeking
to explain all existence as the result of "natural causes."
But,
it may be objected, do not differences in environment bring about
changes in persons? Does not interbreeding produce better animals?
That may be so, but it cannot change a sheep into a horse, and
that, virtually, is what evolution claims. Leave the well bred
animal to itself, and what will happen? Every breeder knows; it
will revert back to type.
|