|
REASON
AND EMOTION
If we do not feel strongly about our message, we shall make
very bad preachers. If something of our emotion does not appear
in what we have to say, we may provoke neither hatred nor
enthusiasm, but we are unlikely to bring conviction. Our "
lectures " should partake more of the burning utterances
of Jesus and the Apostles, than of the calm and detached analyses
of the schoolroom. We ought not to be able to speak of the
sin of the world without disapproval and distress; of the
hypocrisy of confirmed enemies of the Word (such as the Pharisees
of Jesus's day) without repugnance; of the stedfastness of
Paul without admiration; or the love of God in the work of
Jesus without (at the least) appreciation and a sense of debt;
of the Kingdom in which righteousness will reign without desire.
Our message should be so earnest, so intimate in its appeal
to those who listen, that our words cannot fail to convey
what we feel. In this we are in good company, and we have
only to compare the words Jesus did use in his preaching,
with the ones he might have used had he been concerned to
cultivate scientific detachment, to see how inevitable it
is. Thus:
THE
PLEA
" O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets,
and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would
I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth
her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your
house is left unto you desolate . . . Ye shall not see me
henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in
the name of the Lord."44
THE
STATEMENT
Jerusalem, notwithstanding your reputation for maltreating
those who try to teach you, I have attempted often to bring
you to agree with me, but I have failed. You will have cause
to regret this. You will not see me again from now on until
you come to recognise the truth of what I have said to you.
THE
PLEA
" Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden,
and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn
of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find
rest unto your souls."45
THE
STATEMENT
Those of you who are in trouble should come to me. If then
you follow the example of humility I set before you, you will
find the effort well within your power.
We
must speak with feeling, and we must speak to the people we
address. Let there be fewer general remarks about " mankind
being mortal," " the human race being sinful,"
" God's purpose with the earth and man upon it,"
and more powerful calls to each one who labours and is heavy
laden, addressed personally to him, more pressing messages
of personal sin and death, and the hope of personal reconciliation
and life, addressed in our words to those persons there present,
so that each of them feels himself to be concerned.
We
must speak with feeling, but we need to keep watch upon ourselves.
To speak acceptably with feeling, we must really feel. Worse,
perhaps, than the detachment of the mere lecturer, is the
insincere synthetic emotion which is pumped from a shallow
mind. There are sober men and women who shy at the word "
evangelical " from its evil association with the frenzied
utterances of certain " evangelical " preachers,
and the name Jesus has been sullied by the repulsive fluency
with which it is uttered in empty adoration from foaming lips.
We will therefore never manufacture feeling which we do not
possess. Another warning is needed too. It is possible for
the servant of the Lord to attain to a depth of realization
of the glory of his calling, approaching that which was the
experience of Paul46, which is his alone. That feeling is
for him infinitely precious, but as evidence to others it
has no value at all. Those who share it dare not boast of
it, and those who do not cannot understand. " Religious
experience," so freely used in evidence by those who
lack any other, has no evidential value at all, and the Apostle
Paul, who could speak to his brethren of the love of God which
passeth knowledge, spoke to the world of facts.
One
more caution is needed. When we preach, it may not always
be either possible or necessary to prove all that we assert.
In a lecture on Baptism we need not prove that Jesus will
return to the earth, though we can very properly say so; in
one on the Return of Jesus we may well wish to insist that
it holds out hope only to those who have been baptized, without
then shouldering the burden of providing the proof. It may
even happen that a whole lecture is devoted to developing
a theme which is not positively proved at all, though it is
given throughout in its scriptural setting47 in order to insist
upon its importance rather than its basis. Indeed, much of
our public preaching must consist, not in laborious establishment
of everything we say, but in commanding attention to its import.
This
being so, we must sacredly observe this obligation: whatever
we assert, we must know to be true. If we omit the proof,
it must never be because we have no proof, nor because we
do not know it. When we mount the platform, Reason must go
with us, and Truth within; when we open our lips to speak,
Truth must speak through them, and Reason must hold our hand.
We
must have power of indignation and anger. Yet our indignation
must never degenerate into bombast, nor our anger into malice,
and if we denounce, we will be sure to do justice to what
we condemn. We may speak a hard truth if we have the proof,
but sneers, dark hints and insinuations must be shunned. If
we find it necessary, for example, to contrast the faith and
practice of the early church, in all its simplicity, with
the pomp and complexity and compromise of established apostasy,
we will not embellish this with slighting and irrelevant allusions
to the salaries of Archbishops or the " holy tones "
of officiating ministers. If we must question the beliefs
of others-as sometimes we must-we can usually well do without
impugning the sincerity of those who hold them, which does
not concern us, and of which we have frequently no evidence.
To do so is not likely to further our cause.
Jesus,
who knows men's hearts, could both denounce the practice and
condemn the men. As we preach the gospel, we may clear our
path of the obstacles of the former, but leave to Jesus still
the burden of the latter.
|