Christ
The Future World King, continued
It
may be suggested that the New Testament interpretation throws
another light upon the statements of the Old Testament, and
deprives them of the warranty which they seem to afford to
the Jewish doctrine of the Messiah's kingship. It is customary
to assume that this is the case; but the result of an examination
will prove that a more unfounded assumption could not be entertained,
and that the New Testament unmistakably corroborates the teaching
of the prophets on the subject. We are met on the very threshold
by the message delivered by the angel Gabriel to Mary, in
announcing the birth of Christ:
"And,
behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth
a son and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great,
and shall be called the. Son of the Highest; and the
Lord God shall GIVE UNTO HIM THE THRONE OF HIS FATHER
DAVID, and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for
ever; and of his KINGDOM there shall be no end"
(Luke 1v 31, 33).
Here
is a distinct New Testament intimation that it is the purpose
of God to give to Jesus "the throne of his father David."
If we would apprehend the import of this statement, we must
know what is the throne of David. Of David we know something.
He was the most renowned of Israel's Godanointed kings holding
sway over the twelve tribes of Israel in the Holy Land, and
ruling many tributary nations. He was a mighty warrior, a
distinguished prophet, and a poet of the highest type. He
was the progenitor of Christ, through Mary, who was descended
from the royal house; and was a fitting type of his illustrious
son, whom he acknowledged as "My Lord" (Matt. 22v
43). But what of his throne? Peter said, in his address to
the Jews, on the day of Pentecost:
"Therefore
being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with
an oath to him, that of the fruit of his (David's)
loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ
TO SIT ON HIS THRONE" (Acts 2v 30).
There
is, therefore, a connection between Christ's mission and David's
throne. Had David a throne? He had. In what did it consist?
Not in the material structure which he occupied as a seat
in dispensing justice; that has long ago crumbled into dust.
The throne of a kingdom is not the literal seat occupied by
royalty on state occasions. When we speak of the throne of
England, we mean the office or position of monarch in this
country. So with the throne of David; it is said of Solomon,
on the occasion of his accession in the room of David (I Kings
2v 12), "Then sat Solomon on the throne of David his
father." Yet we read in I Kings 10v 18, that
"he made a great throne of ivory, and overlaid it with
the best gold," so that while sitting on the throne of
David his father in the political sense, Solomon really occupied
a different royal seat. "The throne of David" points
to something that pertained to Saul's successor. There
is no getting away from this; and any explanation of the promise
that ignores this as its fundamental element, must be rejected
as unworthy.
Of
this character is the view that Christ is now on David's
throne. Christ is in heaven, and cannot now be sitting on
that throne; for nothing that David ever possessed is in heaven.
David himself is not there; for Peter said in his address
on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2v 34), "David IS NOT ASCENDED
INTO THE HEAVENS." When the time arrives, the throne
of David will be set up again in the earth; and Jesus will
share it with his faithful ones, as intimated in Rev. 3v 21.
"In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David
that is fallen" (Amos 9v 11). That time he spake of when
on earth. He said (Matt. 25v 31), "When the Son of
Man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with
him, THEN shall he sit upon the throne of his glory."
Hence, before Jesus sits upon David's throne, he will return
to earth, appear in Palestine, and assume the position which
David occupied when he swayed the sceptre of Israel; that
is, he will become king of the Jews.
Look
at Ezekiel 11v 25-27. The prophet was sent to Zedekiah, an
unworthy prince, who was the last to occupy David's throne.
He was sent to tell him of coming retribution, and in the
course of his prophecy, he uttered the following words:
"And
thou, profane wicked prince of Israel, whose day is come,
when iniquity shall have an end, Thus saith the Lord God:
Remove the diadem and take off the crown; this shall not
be the same: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is
high. I will overturn, overturn, overturn it: and it
shall be no more UNTIL HE COMES WHOSE RIGHT IT IS; and
I will give it him."
Here
was a diadem to be removed, a crown to be taken off, and a
national polity to be completely abolished, as indicated in
the triple repetition of the verb, "overturn," and
as expressed by the phrase, "it shall be no more."
The prediction related to things Jewish, even to the things
which constitute the throne of David; and its fulfillment
is notorious to every reader of Jewish history. About a year
after its delivery, Zedekiah was uncrowned by Nebuchadnezzar.
The nobles were put to death; the nation was partly massacred,
and partly carried away captive, and the land given over to
desolation. Seventy years after, a partial restoration took
place under Ezra and Nehemiah, but not of the throne of David.
The Jews existed as a vassal people thenceforward; and after
varied political fortunes, were overtaken by a storm which
swept away every vestige of their national existence.
The
Romans, under Vespasian, invaded the country, and subdued
its fortified places; and Vespasian having transferred the
command to Titus, the latter laid siege to Jerusalem, which
at that time was crowded with people from all parts of the
country. The details of that awful siege are familiar to every
one. The city was tediously beleaguered for months; famine
arose among the inhabitants; civil dissensions divided their
counsels, and led to mutual slaughter; and, finally, the place
was sacked and given to the flames, and upwards of 1,000,000
of Jews perished. The remainder were sold as slaves, and scattered
throughout the Roman empire as fugitives; and scattered they
remain to this day. So awfully has the prophecy been fulfilled,
that for the last twenty centuries, the throne of David has
been a mere idle phrase - a tradition of the past; his kingdom
has been overthrown, his land in desolation, and his people
wandering as homeless exiles, unpitied and unpitying.
But
is this condition of David's throne to be perpetual? Are the
Gentiles for ever to exalt their proud horns over the fallen
kingdom of the Lord? (See I Chron. 29v 23; II Chron.9v 8;
13v 8) which affirm the kingdom of Israel to have been the
kingdom of God). Nay, saith the prophecy: desolation shall
only continue UNTIL - until what? "Until HE COME
whose right it is." Who is this? None other than
Jesus Christ, to whom the throne pertains of right, both by
lineal descent, and special divine bequest. Observe, then,
what is distinctly proved, that the things overturned are
the things to be given to Christ at his coming. Now, what
things were those? The diadem, crown, throne, and Kingdom
of David. Hence, when HE COMES whose right they are, he will
enter into their possession in as real a sense as they were
held by Zedekiah. He will become King of the Jews, and Lord
of the whole earth. We thus perceive a striking significance
in the words of the angel:
"The
Lord God shall give unto Jesus THE THRONE OF HIS FATHER
David, and he shall reign over THE HOUSE OF JACOB
for ever; and of HIS KINGDOM there shall be no
end."
|