The
Bible -- What it is, and how to interpret it
"The
time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine.
They shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall
be turned unto fables" (II Tim. 4v 3, 4).
"Of
your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things,
to draw away disciples after them" (Acts 20v 30).
"There
shall be false teachers among you and many shall follow
their pernicious ways, by reason of whom, the way of truth
shall be evil spoken of" (II Pet. 2v 1, 2).
"Try
the spirits whether they are of God, because many false
prophets are gone out into the world" (I John 4v 1).
"Their
word will eat as doth a canker" (II Tim. 2v 17). "All
nations deceived" (Rev. 18, 23).
"To
the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according
to this word, it is because there is no light in them."
(Isaiah 8v 20).
THAT
CHRISTENDOM is astray from the system of doctrine and practice
established by the labours of the apostles in the first century,
is recognised by men of very different ways of thinking. The
unbeliever asserts it without fear. The church partisan admits
it without shame, and all sorts of middle men are of opinion
that it would be a misfortune were it otherwise. The unbeliever,
while himself rejoicing in the fact, uses it as a reproach
to those who profess to follow the apostles whom he openly
rejects, the churchman, while owning the apostles as the foundation,
regards it as the inevitable result of the spiritual prerogative
vested in "the church," that there should be further
unfoldings of light and truth leading away from the primitive
form of things; and the moderate and indifferent class accept
it as a necessary and welcome result of the advance of the
times, with which they think the original apostolic institution
has become inconsistent.
Is
there not another meaning to the fact? To such as have confidence
in the Bible as a divine record, the quotations standing at
the head of this chapter must suggest a view of the present
state of things very different from that entertained by the
common run of religious professors. Do not these quotations
require us to believe that it was in the apostolic foresight
(a foresight imparted to them by that presence of the Holy
Spirit which Jesus before his departure promised he would
secure for them during his absence (John 14v 17: 16v 13) -
that the time coming was a time of departure from what they
preached - when men indulging in "fables" and walking
in "pernicious ways," would wholly turn aside from
the saving institutions of the gospel delivered by them, and
realise the fulfilment of Isaiah's prophecy as to the state
of things upon earth just before the manifestation of God's
glory at the appearing of Christ, viz., that "darkness
should cover the earth and gross darkness the people"?
(Isa. 60v 2). Such a view may bring lamentable conclusions,
and be fruitful of personal embarrassments in a state of society
where a man cannot prosper unless he fall down and worship
the current "doxy." But an earnest mind will not
be debarred by such considerations from the investigation
of a momentous topic. "What is the truth?" is the
engrossing question of men of this type, and they follow wherever
the answer may lead them, even "to prison and death,"
if that were possible in our age.
We
propose this investigation in the following lectures. Such
subjects have been supposed to pertain exclusively to the
clerical province. Obviously, it is not a likely theme for
a clergyman to discuss whether the whole system of clericalism
itself be not a departure from Bible truth. It is not one
which he is specially fitted to consider. And, in point of
fact, it is more and more generally conceded that questions
of Bible truth are matters of nonprofessional understanding
and concern. Nothing but an untrammelled individual knowledge
of the Bible will satisfy the earnest curiosity that would
know what the truth is amid the intellectual turmoils, questionings
and collisions of modern times. If the Bible is God's voice
to every man that has ears to hear (which it demonstrably
is), it is for every man by himself and for himself, to seek
to understand it, and to extend the benefit he may have received.
Qualification
for this is not a question of "ordination": it comes
with enlightenment. And not only qualification, but obligation
comes with this enlightenment. As soon as a man understands
and believes the gospel, he is bound to lend himself as an
instrument for its diffusion. The command is direct from the
mouth of the Lord Jesus himself: "Let him that heareth
say, COME" (Rev. 22v 17), the example of the early Christians
affords unmistakable illustration of the meaning of the command
(Acts 8v 14). Tradition clings to "holy orders."
Of these we hear nothing in the Scripture. Apostolic teaching
inculcates the common sense view that the truth of God is
designed to make propagandists of all who receive it.
The
subject of this afternoon's lecture is the natural starting
point of all endeavours to ascertain what the Bible teaches.
We want to know what the Bible is in itself, and on what principles
it is to be understood. On the first of these points, we must
take a good deal for granted. We shall assume throughout these
lectures that the Bible is a book of Divine authorship. Our
present duty is simply to look at the structure and character
of the Bible as a book appearing before us with a professedly
divine character taken for granted. Looking at it in this
way, we first discover that the Bible consists in reality
of a number of books written at different times by different
authors. It opens with five, familiarly known as the "five
books of Moses," a history written by Moses, of matters
and transactions in which he performed a leading personal
part. This history occupies a position of first importance.
It lays the basis of all that follows. Commencing with an
account of the creation and peopling of the earth, it chiefly
treats of the origin and experience of the Jewish nation,
of whom Moses says, "The Lord hath chosen thee to be
a peculiar people unto Himself, above all the nations that
are upon the earth" (Deut. 14v 2). The five books also
contain the laws (very elaborately stated), which God delivered
by the hand of Moses, for the constitution and guidance of
the nation.
It
has become fashionable, under various learned sanctions, to
question the authenticity of these books, while admitting
the possible genuineness of the remaining portions of the
Sacred Record. Without attempting to discuss the question,
we may remark that it is impossible to reconcile this attitude
with allegiance to Christ. You cannot reject Moses while accepting
Christ. Christ endorsed the writings of Moses. He said to
the Jews by the mouth of Abraham in parable: "They have
Moses and the prophets, let them hear them, if they
hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded,
though one rose from the dead" (Luke 16v 29, 31). It
is also recorded that when he appeared incognito to
two of his disciples after his resurrection, "beginning
at MOSES and all the prophets, he expounded unto them
in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself"
(Luke 14v 27). Further, he said, "Had ye believed
MOSES, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of
me. But IF YE BELIEVE NOT HIS WRITINGS, HOW SHALL
YE BELIEVE MY WORDS?" (John 5v 46, 47). If Christ was
divine, this sanction of the Pentateuch by him settles the
question; if the Pentateuch is a fiction, Christ was a deceiver,
whether consciously or otherwise. There is no middle ground.
Moses and Christ stand or fall together.
The
next twelve books present the history of the Jews during a
period of several centuries, involving the development of
the mind of God to the extent to which that was unfolded in
the message prophetically addressed to the people in the several
stages of their history. This gives them more than a historical
value. They exhibit and illustrate divine principles of action,
while furnishing an accurate account of the proceedings of
a nation which was itself a monument of divine work on the
earth, and the repository of divine revelation. (See The
Visible Hand of God, by the Lecturer). The book
of Job is no exception as to divinity of character. It does
not, however, pertain to Israel nationally. It is a record
of divine dealings with a Son of God, at a time when that
nation had no existence. Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and
the Song of Solomon, are the inspired writings of two of Israel's
most illustrious kings - writings in which natural genius
is supplemented with preternatural spirit impulse, in consequence
of which the writings so produced are reflections of divine
wisdom, and by no means of merely human origin. This is proved
by Christ's declarations in the New Testament.
In
the books of the prophets, from Isaiah to Malachi, we are
presented with a most important department of "Holy Writ."
In these seventeen books - respectively bearing the names
of the writers - we find recorded a multitudinous variety
of messages transmitted from the Deity to the "prophets,"
for the correction and enlightenment of Israel. These messages
are valuable beyond all conception. They contain information
concerning God otherwise inaccessible, and instructions as
to acceptable character and conduct, otherwise unobtainable;
in addition to which they have a transcendent value from their
disclosure of God's purpose in the future, in which we naturally
have the highest interest, but of which, naturally, we are
in the greatest and most helpless ignorance.
Coming
to the New Testament, we are furnished in the first four books
with a history which has no parallel in the range of literature.
The Messiah promised in the prophets, appointed of God to
deliver our suffering race from all the calamities in which
it is involved, appears: and here are recorded His doings
and His sayings. What wonderful deeds! What wonderful words!
We are constrained in the reading to exclaim with the disciples
on the sea of Galilee: "What manner of man is this?"
He entrusted his apostles with a mission to the world at large.
In the Acts of the Apostles we have made plain to us in a
practical way, what Christ intended them to do as affecting
ourselves. In the same book we have the proceedings of the
primitive Christians, written for our guidance as to the real
import of the commandments of Christ, and the real scope and
nature of the work of Christ among men. The remainder of the
New Testament is made up of a series of epistles, addressed
by the inspired apostles to various Christian communities,
after they had been organised by the apostolic labours. These
letters contain practical instruction in regard to the character
which Christians ought to cultivate, and in a general and
incidental way illustrate the higher aspects of the truth
as it is in Jesus. Without these epistles, we should not have
been able to comprehend the Christian system in its entirety.
Their absence would have been a great blank; and we in this
remote age should hardly have been able to lay hold on eternal
life.
Such
is a scant outline of the book we call "the Bible."
Composed of many books, it is yet one volume, complete and
consistent with itself in all its parts, presenting this singular
literary spectacle, that while written by men in every situation
of life - from the king to the shepherd - and scattered over
many centuries in its composition, it is pervaded by absolute
unity of spirit and identity of principle. This is unaccountable
on the hypothesis of a human authorship. No similarly miscellaneous
production is like it in this respect. Heterogeneousness,
and not uniformity, characterizes any collection of human
writings of the ordinary sort, even if belonging to the same
age. But here is a book written by forty authors, living in
different ages, without possible concert or collusion, producing
a book which in all its parts is pervaded by one spirit, one
doctrine, one design, and by an air of sublime authority which
is its peculiar characteristic. Such a book is a literary
miracle. It is impossible to account for its existence upon
ordinary principles. The futile attempts of various classes
of unbelievers is evidence of this. On its own principles
it is accounted for God spoke to, and by, its authors "at
sundry times and in divers manners." This is no mere
profession on the part of the writers. It is strewn to be
a true profession not only of the character of the book and
the fulfilment of its prophecies, but by the fact that nearly
all the writers sealed their testimony with their own blood,
after a life of submission to every kind of disadvantage -
"trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea, moreover,
of bonds and imprisonments, were stoned, were sawn asunder,
were tempted, were slain with the sword, wandered about in
sheep skins and goat skins, in deserts and mountains; in dens
and caves of the earth - being destitute, afflicted, tormented"
(Heb. 11v 36-38). To suppose the Bible to be human is to raise
insurmountable difficulties, and to do violence to every reasonable
probability. The only truly rational theory of the book is
that supplied by itself. "Holy men of God spake as they
were moved by the Holy Spirit" (II Peter 1v 21). In this
we find an explanation of the whole matter. The presence of
one supreme guiding mind, inspiring and controlling the utterances
of the authors, completely accounts for their agreement of
teaching throughout, and for the exalted nature of their doctrines:
on any other supposition the book is a riddle, which must
ever puzzle and bewilder the mind that earnestly faces all
the facts of the case.
|