Irresistible Forces, And immovable objects.
| Back to Index
Evangelion
Posted: Jan 7 2003, 07:13 PM  

Archived Post

The other day, I was walking down the street and I fell into a big hole. The hole was very dark, and it took me a long time to get out of it.

The next day, I was walking down the same street. I knew the hole was there, but I still fell into it. The hole was very dark, and it took me a long time to get out of it.

The next day, I was walking down the same street. I saw the hole and went to walk past. But I was too close and I fell into it. The hole was very dark, and it took me a long time to get out of it.

The next day, I was walking down the same street. I saw the hole and I walked carefully around it.

But the next day... I walked down a different street.


Turn to Proverbs 10:9.


    He that walketh uprightly walketh surely: but he that perverteth his ways shall be known.

Think carefully about what this is saying.


Brethren and sisters, today it is my intention to show you how to become an immovable object. But before I can do that, I have to warn you about an irresistible force. And that force is temptation.

Now, you might think that’s a strange thing to say, because surely, it’s sin that’s the irresistible force. You may have heard people talking about it. Sin is a popular topic – because it’s a popular pastime! You may have read things like “The wages of sin is death”, and “For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.” You may have first hand experience about the consequences of sin in your own life. Well, speaking for myself, I’m not really interested in sin.

I’m more into temptation. So that’s what I’m going to talk about.


You know as well as I do, of course, that temptation takes many forms. Sometimes we tempt ourselves, and sometimes other people tempt us. Occasionally, we are tempted by people we generally regard as friends – or at least, friendly acquaintances. Very often (though not always), our non-Christadelphian friends are to blame. But why would they tempt you to sin? What’s in it for them? Well, that depends on the sin, doesn’t it? And it also depends on the circumstances. And it also depends on whether or not they actually knew that they were trying to get you to sin. That’s lot to think about – so just look at these ideas one by one.


Firstly, when someone suggests something to you that you don’t feel comfortable with, it does not always mean that they are trying to make you sin. This is true of people in the world, and it is true of Christadelphians, both young or old. For example, in Romans 14, Paul talks about how this can happen in the ecclesia. In verse 2, he says “For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. Let not him that eateth, despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not, judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.”

What’s Paul saying? He’s saying that people have different standards and different ideas about what’s acceptable to God. He points out that some of these standards and ideas aren’t from the Bible – God didn’t give them to us, we just made them up ourselves. And he points out that setting extra standards for yourself is OK, as long as your standards aren’t lower than God’s. But he also says that not everyone is going to think the same way you do. Not everyone feels comfortable with your idea of “the right thing”. Occasionally, you may offend someone because you handled a situation differently. They saw you doing the “wrong thing”, while you felt sure that you were doing the “right thing”.


Your reasons for having different standards, can take many forms. For example, when you were young, Mum and Dad probably said “These are the family standards. That’s how our family does things.” As you grew older, you questioned and examined examined those standards carefully - and they still felt right to you, so that’s how you do things today.

Alternatively, it may be that you’ve thought about things which your family standards don’t necessarily cover, and you’ve added your ideas to the standards you were brought up with. Or, again, you might have had an experience that changes your way of seeing things - and so your ideas about what’s acceptable and what’s not, will change on the basis of this experience. But whatever your standards, and whatever your ideas, one thing remains true: you must always be able to show a reason. That’s the most important thing. Because a reason gives you purpose – it’s not just the explanation for your behaviour; it’s also part of the goal. When you can show people a reason, it’s as if you’re saying to them:

  • “This is where I’m going."

  • "This is why I want to go."

  • "And this is how I’m going to get there.”


So now, think about your non-Christadelphian friends. The way they think, speak and behave, is guided by their standards and ideas - not yours. And sometimes, they forget this... and sometimes they don’t. Every now and then, they’ll suggest something that makes you feel uncomfortable – and they don’t really mean to. Sometimes, however, they may want to wind you up a bit, and have some fun – so they’ll challenge you to try their standards. Their ideas about “the right thing to do” and “the wrong thing to do”.

What’s in it for them? Well, a good laugh, perhaps. They might get a kick out of watching you squirm. Or they might have other motives – they know they’d feel more comfortable with you, if only you’d feel more comfortable with them. And, whether deliberately or not, they’ll drag you down to their level of behaviour and thinking. Later, they may claim that they forgot you were supposed to be different.

And sometimes, that’s your fault, not theirs. Because they can only forget that you’re different, if they had first been told that you are!

Hold that thought.


Ok, so that’s a brief look at temptation and pressure from other people. I’ll be coming back to it later, and showing you how to deal with it. But for the moment, I’ll move on, to temptation and pressure from another source – yourselves.

Turn to Romans 7:21.

    I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
    For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
    But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
    O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
    I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.


Paul has a problem. It’s a problem he shared with all of us. There are times when you want to serve God, and you may even start changing your behaviour (for a while, at least), but sooner or later, you’ll be worn out by the inner struggle that’s always taking place. Now, this inner struggle is obviously a good thing, because as Paul says, it shows that your conscience is working hard to keep you on the right track. But it does create a certain confusion. You may question why it is that you’re doing something – is it because you really want to please God, or are you just keeping the peace to avoid a lecture from your parents and peers?


Sometimes, you might think to yourself “Well, my conscience says that this is OK, and the apostle Paul tells me that I’m allowed to follow my conscience even if other people disagree with me, so I’ll just go ahead and do as I like.” Occasionally, you may decide that it’s not so much of a problem where you go or who you’re with, but what you do once you’re there – in other words, if you’re careful, you can have a taste of both worlds, and still not be accused of disobeying God.

Does this work? Well, no. In fact it presents more problems than it solves. Instead of making life clearer, it will only add to your confusion. On the one hand, you’re trying to keep a clear conscience and not offend God, but on the other hand, you’re trying to get away with as much as you can. Christ says that this is an impossible situation, for how will you know when you’re trying to develop your conscience, and when you’re just trying to indulge yourself?

In Matthew 12:25, Jesus said “Every city or house divided against itself, shall not stand”. In James 1:8, the brother of Jesus said “A double minded man is unstable in all his ways”. In Revelation 3:16, John said that the ecclesia of Laodicea will be condemned because it is neither hot nor cold – it is weak and indefinite. God wants us to realise that just because we’re allowed to use our consciences, does not mean we’re allowed to make it up as we go along.

Don’t be fooled, brethren and sisters – we’ll never make it to the kingdom if our moral backbones have the consistency of rubber. God’s looking for stones to build his global ecclesia – stones fitly joined together, and resting on the solid foundation of Christ. Floppy people need not apply. And this is where I’d like to examine temptation in more detail.


“Resist the devil, and he will flee from you”. That’s what we read in James 4:7. Turn it up if you like, because I’ll be staying in James for a while. The apostle is telling us that as long as we genuinely fight against our natural impulses, we stand a chance of prevailing against them. The moment we cease to fight, we have lost. It’s all a matter of self control, and knowing what you’re capable of before you take up the challenge.

In James 1:12-15, we read"

    Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.
    Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth He any man:
    But every man is tempted when he is drawn away by his own lust, and enticed.
    Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.


James is bringing up a lot of interesting ideas here. But the one that I’d like to concentrate on, is the fact that every man is tempted when he is drawn away by his own lust, and enticed. What exactly does that mean? Well, my understanding is that different things appeal to different people. What tempts you, may not interest me – and what I find tremendously exciting, will probably bore you senseless.

I was made aware of this in a very practical sense when, one day when I still lived in Tasmania, our next door neighbours called on my twin brother and I, and offered us some drugs. We declined. They went back to their house, had a party, and got thoroughly drunk. And there the matter ended.

Our neighbours had not been offended by our refusal, but they made no further attempts to include us in their lifestyle. They knew that we were Christians, and they knew where we stood. Things might have been very different however, if they had made an offer that we were less likely to refuse. If it had been a gift of stolen, untraceable money for example, our answer may still have been “No” – but perhaps a quiet “No”... a reluctant “No”. A “No” that really meant “I want to, but I’m not allowed...

Not a very strong response. Not a very convincing response. And certainly, a response that (quite deliberately) leaves the door open for temptation in the future. Because to people who don’t care about God, a reluctant “No”, simply means “Come back later when I’m not feeling so strong”. And believe me – they will!


What I learned from this experience – and others I have had – is that there is a great deal of truth in the proverb “Every man has his price”. By that I simply mean, “You can bribe anyone, as long as you know what to offer."

Of course, the offer isn’t always money. It may be other things – less obvious, but no less enticing. It may the offer of an opportunity; a chance; a place; a gift; a person – maybe even a relationship. And curiously, you will sometimes find that the thing which you thought you weren’t interested in before, is actually quite appealing. Because although the thing itself has not changed, the circumstances under which it is being offered, have. Perhaps there is more pressure on you this time; perhaps you might think that you can “get away with it this time”; perhaps you may wish to try the experience “just once”; perhaps you may think that you have something to prove to others, or to yourself.

But this is dangerous ground.


Come with me to I Corinthians 10:12-14.

    Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
    There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.
    Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.


Paul gives a strong warning here. He is concerned because the Corinthians think that just because they have a strong conscience, they can allow themselves greater liberties - trusting themselves not to be enticed by temptation. In other words, the Corinthians are too confident; they’re not worried about temptation because they really don’t think it will happen to them. But they are wrong.

Paul goes on to say that all humans share the same basic temptations, and that sooner or later, we all make mistakes. Notwithstanding this, he encourages us to look beyond the temptation – he reminds us that God provides a way out of every situation.

Sometimes we think differently. Sometimes we feel that a temptation was inescapable – we could not possibly have avoided it. And yet, Paul says that we can escape temptation – so how should this be done? My suggestion to you, brethren and sisters, is that temptation arises with a situation – and sin is the result of involving yourself in that situation. You see, there are two basic approaches to the problem of temptation. We can stand our ground, and fight it out – or we can just run away.

And now I’d like to show you how these two methods work...


The "Stand and Fight" Method
Firstly, let’s assume that you’re in a situation where temptation has arisen. If you think you’re strong enough, you can stay where you are, remain in the situation, and resist the temptation. What are the advantages? Well, if you resist the temptation once, it becomes easier to resist a second time – and your example will be a great encouragement to anyone who sees it. Not only that, but you may win a personal victory that you’ve never won before.

Turn to I Samuel 24:3-7.

    And he came to the sheepcotes by the way, where was a cave; and Saul went in to cover his feet: and David and his men remained in the sides of the cave.
    And the men of David said unto him, Behold the day of which the LORD said unto thee, Behold, I will deliver thine enemy into thine hand, that thou mayest do to him as it shall seem good unto thee. Then David arose, and cut off the skirt of Saul's robe privily.
    And it came to pass afterward, that David's heart smote him, because he had cut off Saul's skirt.
    And he said unto his men, The LORD forbid that I should do this thing unto my master, the LORD's anointed, to stretch forth mine hand against him, seeing he is the anointed of the LORD.
    So David stayed his servants with these words, and suffered them not to rise against Saul. But Saul rose up out of the cave, and went on his way.


David is given an opportunity to kill his worst enemy, and passes it up. Why? He’s has been hounded by this man for months. Saul has chased him, divided his family, driven him out of Israel, thrown things at him, slandered his name and murdered the priests who tried to help the man they knew had been anointed king. David’s a hero! He doesn’t have to put up with this! The humiliation, the lies, the treachery, the destruction of his reputation in Israel... surely God has sent him the one chance by which all this can be wiped away - permanently!

He’s in that situation right now; it even came to him, he didn’t go looking for it. Something has to be done to resolve that situation – and it’s all up to David. Can you imagine the men with him? Can you imagine the pressure?

  • The men who appealed to his sense of duty:
    “This man is a lunatic! Kill him and set Israel free!”

  • The men who appealed to his sense of honour:
    “It’s OK, David – we know you wouldn’t stab a man in the back. Just tap him on the shoulder and knife him as he turns round. Easy as.”

  • The men who appealed to his vanity:
    “You’re twice the man he is! Now’s the chance to show him who’s boss!”

  • The men who appealed to his warrior spirit:
    “Come on, David – don’t be shy! Here’s a sword – get it into him! Make him squeal!”

Can you imagine the confusion in David’s mind? This was a golden opportunity to satisfy a burning hunger for revenge, and at the same time, remove the man who had abused his God-given authority. Surely, surely the hand of Yahweh was giving him this chance!

And yes, that was ineed true. God had given him this chance... which is why he was so careful not to waste it by killing Saul! Because David recognised that here was an unavoidable temptation – a situation thrust upon him. No chance to run away. A decision had to be made.

Let's stop for a moment and try to imagine how David might have worked the problem out in his own mind:

  • Saul is unfit to be king, and Saul is the enemy of God.

  • God says that I must destroy His enemies.

  • Samuel has anointed me to be the new king, and God has said that I will be.

  • Therefore, if I kill Saul, God’s promise comes true, and He loses an enemy.

  • But Samuel also anointed Saul, on God’s authority. And God says that it is a sin to kill His anointed. Therefore, if I kill Saul, God’s promise comes true, but only because I disobeyed God to make it happen sooner!

  • Conclusion? God would not ask me to disobey Him, in order to fulfil His prophecy! God needs no help from me – and He’s not in the habit of asking me to sin. That’s not how God works.

What David realised, is that that God doesn’t give use problems that need to be solved by disobedience. In fact, quite the opposite. He gives use situations that require personal sacrifice – giving up some pride; giving up something valuable; giving up an opportunity you’d been hoping for. And if you can do that, then you’re in good company. Because David did this. Not once, but twice. And he found that the second time was easier.

You see, later, when he finds Saul asleep in the valley, David doesn’t even worry about how he’s going to act, and he doesn’t spend his time arguing with himself. But he doesn’t avoid the situation, either – in fact, he deliberately involves himself. He steals Saul’s spear, and a jug of water. He could do this, because he could trust himself. He knew that having fought the temptation once, he would win again. He had strengthened his self control. I’ll bet it wasn’t an easy task.

But not everyone is capable of facing every tempting situation, and fighting successfully. Sometimes you’re not prepared. Sometimes the temptation’s greater than you thought. Often, you just didn’t know how you would react in that situation, and you surprised yourself by failing to resist. You’ve let yourself down. It hurts.

Turn to Luke 22:55-62.

    And when they had kindled a fire in the midst of the hall, and were set down together, Peter sat down among them.
    But a certain maid beheld him as he sat by the fire, and earnestly looked upon him, and said, This man was also with him.
    And he denied him, saying, Woman, I know him not.
    And after a little while another saw him, and said, Thou art also of them. And Peter said, Man, I am not.
    And about the space of one hour after another confidently affirmed, saying, Of a truth this fellow also was with him: for he is a Galilaean.
    And Peter said, Man, I know not what thou sayest. And immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew.
    And the Lord turned, and looked upon Peter. And Peter remembered the word of the Lord, how he had said unto him, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.
    And Peter went out, and wept bitterly...


Oh dear.

This “stand up and take it like a man” business is a lot harder than it looks. You see, Peter had promised Jesus that he would die for him! But when it came to the crunch, Peter was the one who lived... because the temptation to lie, and save himself, was far greater than he’d expected. Yes, when the situation arose, Peter decided to stay in it – and with all the best intentions. He had hoped to make a stand for Christ. He had hoped - like David - to stare temptation in the face, and walk away in triumph. To prove his self control to the world - and to his Lord.

But he made a terrible mistake... he sat near the fire. And the problem with fires is that they make you hot. In fact, if you’re too close, they make you uncomfortably hot. And the longer Peter sat by the fire, the hotter he became. Until finally, he wanted to move. And when he did leave, no-one noticed... except the man who died so that Peter might live.

The lesson for us? Know what you’re capable of. Don’t bite off more than you can chew. And that’s where the second approach to temptation comes in. Whereas the first approach is the bold, “Wait until you see the whites of their eyes” method, this one is completely different. I call it the “running away” method. Let’s see how it works.


The "Running Away" Method:
Well, it’s fairly simple, really. Instead of involving yourself in the situation and trying to change the outcome, you remove yourself from the situation entirely. Because if you were never there, you couldn’t have done anything wrong. Easy to say, perhaps – but is it easy to do? And are there disadvantages to this method? Let's turn to Genesis 39:7-12, and find out...

    And it came to pass after these things, that his master's wife cast her eyes upon Joseph; and she said, Lie with me.
    But he refused, and said unto his master's wife, Behold, my master knoweth not what is with me in the house, and he hath committed all that he hath to my hand;
    There is none greater in this house than I; neither hath he kept back any thing from me but thee, because thou art his wife: how then can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God?
    And it came to pass, as she spoke to Joseph day by day, that he hearkened not unto her, to lie by her, or to be with her.
    And it came to pass about this time, that Joseph went into the house to do his business; and there was none of the men of the house there within.
    And she caught him by his garment, saying, Lie with me: and he left his garment in her hand, and fled, and got him out.


Joseph was a great believer in the “Running away” method. And it worked for him – but why? Look closely at the situation. What do you have here? An attractive and strong-minded woman who’s accustomed to getting her own way, and a quiet, handsome, God-fearing young man. The woman knows what she wants, and she’s not shy about saying so. The man knows that she’s available, but he also knows that he’s responsible for everything he does in God’s sight.

Potiphar’s wife makes every attempt to involve Joseph in a situation that will drag him down to her level. She deliberately creates opportunities for both of them to sin. Whenever possible, she spends time with Joseph – she looks for him, she watches him, she hunts him, and she brings the temptation to him. And at last, she throws herself at him, hoping that his resistance has finally broken down.

But look at the series of events, brethren and sisters. Look at how Potiphar’s wife spoke to Joseph every day, and followed him about. Look at how she ignored his call to reason. Look at how she was always chasing him. There’s the key, brethren and sisters – she was always chasing him. Joseph was no fool! He knew that you don’t have to chase something if it always stays in one spot!

And I’m telling you, he was always on the move! If she was inside the house – he made sure he was outside, cutting the lawn, where everybody could see him. If she was outside – he’d be inside, dusting off the china, or vacuuming the lounge. In other words, he was never near her. She had to bring the temptation to him, because he was careful not to ask for it.

Now, please don’t misunderstand Joseph. It’s not that he wasn’t interested in women. I’m sure he was – in fact, his behaviour confirms it. Because if he was never interested in Potiphar’s wife, then why was he always running away? Well it’s very simple, brethren and sisters. Joseph knew that God never tempts us beyond our resistance – we do it to ourselves.

Sure, Joseph could have made his excuses to God:

  • “Look, I lasted for a month, what more do You want?”

  • “How could I know that it would get to this stage?”

  • "She was always hanging around me, so what did You expect me to do?”

Like David, Joseph knew what he was capable of. Unlike Peter, he never gave himself an impossible task. So while Potiphar’s wife was busy creating situations, Joseph was twice as busy avoiding them. He wasn’t the sort of person who says “I’ll just see how much I can resist." I’ll bet he had a fair idea of how much he could resist, and he wasn’t stupid enough to push that resistance to its limit.

So, what are the advantages to the “running away” method? Well, it works. (That’s definitely an advantage!) And it’s better than changing your mind when it’s already too late to do so. And once you start using this method, it gets easier and easier. But there is a small problem – it involves a bit of sacrifice. And the sacrifice required is none other than pride. Because in order to use the “Running away” method, you have to admit that in some areas, you have a weakness. Or, to put it another way, you have to be honest enough to say to yourself “If the situation went this far, I couldn’t trust myself to just get out of it”.


Let's consider another Bible character - Samson.

Samson was a big strong man, who didn’t believe in the “running away” method. He knew what he was capable of, and he believed that his self control was enough to keep him out of trouble. You can read about his astonishing lack of success in Judges 14, 15, and 16. Isn't it interesting that Joseph spends a few verses resisting Potiphar’s wife, while Samson takes three chapters to realise his mistake? Why was that, do you think?

The answer, of course, is simple. Joseph avoided situations, while Samson created them. He spent most of his time saying “I’ll get it right next time”. But one day, there wasn’t a “next time”, because Samson died, remember? He didn’t get a chance to try it all again...

By contrast, Potiphar’s wife spent most of her time saying “I’ll get Joseph next time”. But one day, there wasn’t a “next time”, because she lost her temper with him, and God used the opportunity to take Joseph away. God knew that Joseph would be safer elsewhere – and when you think about the fact the Joseph was safer in prison than he was with Potiphar’s wife, the old “Running away” method starts to look pretty good!


What are the disadvantages to the “Running away” method? Well, you have to swallow a bit of pride. You have to admit your mistakes. You have to look a bit foolish sometimes. You have to sound pious now and then. And people might laugh. People might think you’re weak. That’s up to them. But when you’ve avoided temptation yet again, and they’re still wrestling with the consequences of what they did last year, who’s the weak one?

It’s a hard way, brethren and sisters. But very often, it’s the only way. And do you think you’ll be thanked for it? Do you think people will look up to you for it, praise you for it, congratulate you for it?

Nope.

Well, some might. Those who know what you’re going through. Those who’ve done it before. Those who really understand what you’re doing. Those who respect your principles and admire your self control.

And God certainly will, brethren and sisters. He’ll be immensely proud. He’ll watch every move you make, and not one of your brave efforts will be missed. Can you imagine anything better than having God as a witness to all your successes..?


Some days, you feel disheartened. Some days you feel as if you’re the only one who’s trying to maintain a straight path through life. You’ve put your heart into a week of sacrifice, devotion and sincerity. You’ve suffered for your faith – but nobody seems to care. In fact, things haven’t even improved. And, which is worse, all the people around you seem to be getting away with murder – and enjoying it!

Ecclesiastes 9 was written for occasions such as this. In it, Solomon concludes that all human achievement is empty unless it is performed in God’s service. And he says that no matter what you do, and no matter how righteous it is, the people of this world aren’t going to take any notice, unless it directly involves them. He says that the bad people in this world get away with just about everything, so they do what they like. (Because as far they are concerned, rules are only made for people who keep them...) And the good people in this world, the ones who are trying to do the right thing, still have to put up with the bad things of life.

But Solomon also says this:

    Though a sinner do evil an hundred times, and his days be prolonged, yet surely I know that it shall be well with them that fear God, which fear before Him. But it shall not be well with the wicked, neither shall he prolong his days, which are as a shadow; because he feareth not before God.

We can doubt this at times. It just doesn’t seem realistic – or maybe it’s an exaggeration! How can God be working for good in our lives when our faithful service seems to go unrewarded, and others profit at our expense?

Doesn’t God know? Doesn’t God care?

Oh yes. He does. Look, I’ll show you.


In I Kings 19, Elijah is on the run from Ahab and Jezebel. At first, he has a head start, and he gets as far as Jezreel before being discovered. That’s a journey of more than seventy miles north from his starting point. Then he doubles back – to Beersheba. That’s more than a hundred miles south, but it’s still not far enough. Finally, with the very last of his strength, Elijah staggers a few extra miles into the wilderness, where he confidently expects to die. But God sends an angel to strengthen him with food and drink. And Elijah travels for forty days and nights, until he arrives at Mount Horeb. Here, he speaks with God.


Elijah says “Look, I’ve had enough of being a prophet, because the job is simply impossible. Ahab and Jezebel have killed all the priests, converted the nation to idolatry, and destroyed the altars, and now they’re after me. I’m the only one left in the whole nation who’s even trying to be righteous.”

And God says “The only one?”

And Elijah says “Yes, the only one!”

And God says “So... you wouldn’t include the seven thousand people who have not bowed to Baal, then?”

And Elijah coughs, and shuffles his feet a bit.

And he says “Ah. Yes. Well *ahem* of course, that would make me the seven thousand and first person in the whole nation who’s even trying to be righteous.”

And God says... "Exactly."


And after that, Elijah gets up, and goes back to work. Because all of a sudden, life has come into focus. Elijah’s got perspective. He’s just realised that sometimes we can be self righteous without even knowing it. And sometimes, we can forget that we’re not the only ones. Instead of thinking about ourselves, brethren and sisters, let’s think of others. Let’s gain strength from the thought that we’re all in this together.


At the beginning of my study, I told you that if you want people to know that you’re different, you have to tell them. I’d like to come back to that idea, and examine it more closely. Because so far, I’ve spent my time discussing the irresistible force – temptation – and how you’re supposed to deal with it. But simply knowing how to deal with a problem, does not mean that you’re capable of doing so. You may have the instructions – but do you have the tools?

I’d like to talk about separation – and I should point out that separation does not mean isolation. God does not require you to become a hermit. He simply asks you to put some distance between yourself and the things that will corrupt you. And as I’ve already pointed out, if you spend a good deal of your time avoiding those things, then separation will come more easily to you. This separation business needs to be taken seriously. Because it’s no good saying one thing, and doing another. It’s no good promising to change, if you never really do. And you can’t blame anyone but yourself for the consequences of failing to separate yourself from something that’s bad for you.

Time for a history lesson.


There were two great opera writers in the 19th century. Their names were Gilbert and Sullivan. They produced superb music, but they disliked each other very much. The only reason they continued to work together was because they received enormous amounts of money for it. And yet, their working relationship was terrible, and it caused them both a great deal of stress. They regularly insulted each other – in fact, Gilbert once said of Sullivan “He is like a man sitting on a stove, who complains that his backside is on fire!”

I rather like that comment. I like it even more for the fact that Gilbert didn’t seem to notice that it applied just as much to himself, as it did to his partner. And if Gilbert had read his Bible, he would have discovered some useful advice in II Corinthians 6:14.

    Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?

Paul is no fool. He understands the need for separation. He tells us about it quite plainly. But he also introduces a new idea – being yoked together. A curious thought. Sounds too much like work to be enjoyable. What does it mean?

Well Paul is telling us that if you’re going to get through life, you’ll need help. So choose it carefully. And once you’ve found good help, keep it close to you. He’s talking about people. He’s talking about friends in the Christadelphian community. Parents, brothers, sisters, members of the Youth Group. People who work with you as a team. A strong team.


I remember reading about a strong team. They were three friends. Three young men of equal ability. Someone was trying to make them do something that would bring shame on themselves, and dishonour to God. And you know, individually, they might not have been capable of resistance. But Solomon says that a three fold cord is not easily broken – and these men proved him right. They were in a foreign land – Babylon. They weren’t safely isolated from worldly people – in fact, they were in the middle of the king’s court. But they were separated. Separated in the mind. Where it counts. And since their minds controlled their actions, their behaviour was separated from the behaviour of the people around them. Not surprisingly, this is what led to them being thrown into a furnace.

Out of which they walked.

Together.

Equally yoked...


Imagine for a moment, that you're currently sitting in a large hall, full of people. (Let's say 300+ - just for the sake of the argument.) They're sitting in two equal groups, with an aisle down the middle.

Imagine that I ask one of the people in the front row of the right hand side, to stand up for a moment. And then I invited everybody else to take a good long stare at that person. They’re very conspicuous, aren’t they? And oh dear, they look rather embarrassed, too. Because I’ve just separated them from the rest of you. So all of a sudden, they’ve become different. Not very nice being different, is it? Let’s give them some company. See if that helps.

So imagine that someone else - from the back row of the right hand side - to stand up as well. Now we have two people who are different. Conspicuous. Obvious. Separated from us. And – which is more important – isolated from each other. Not very nice when the only person who can relate to you is two hundred miles away, is it? Let’s move things along a bit.

Imagine that the rest of the people on that row to stand up. And everybody else is invited to stare. You can even point at them, if you like – I won’t be offended!


So we have a whole row of people now. Well, that’s better than it was, I suppose. They can all be different together. But they’re no match for the people sitting down. The people who are comfortable. The people who are in a better position. No-one stares or points at them. They’re the normal people. And they’re looking at this ragged group of awkward people.

But not for long.


Imagine that everybody on the right hand side of the hall, stands up - and that once they've done so, they turn on the spot, and look at the people on the left hand side of the hall... who are still sitting down.

Well, that’s rather interesting, isn’t it? Because suddenly, these people don’t look awkward any more. And they’re separated (from the people of the left hand side of the hall) but they’re definitely not isolated. And you know, I think that if anyone’s going to be embarrassed, it’s these people on the left hand side of the hall, sitting down. They’ve suddenly become the different people. The people in the uncomfortable position. Because right in front of their eyes, a very small group just became an army.

Now, if asked one of these imaginary people standing up, to sit down, what would the people on either side of him do? Perhaps they'd sit down with him. Perhaps they'd continue to stand. We don't know until we try. And perhaps they don't know, either...


Unity is strength. You’ve heard me say that before. You’ll hear me say it again. I like saying it. It is true. And it’s a truth that has held my life together through some very dark times.

I called these people - the ones who are standing up - an army. And that’s what they are. The apostle Paul describes them in Ephesians 6:13. He says that they have the whole armour of God. He says that they have the truth at their belts and righteousness as a breastplate. He says that their feet are covered with the preparation of the gospel of peace, and that they carry the shield of faith. He says that on their heads they have the helmet of salvation, and in their hands, the sword of the spirit, which is the word of God.

Paul was talking about the ideal soldier. The best soldier in the world. And at that time, the best soldier in the world was the Roman soldier. Because he was the most disciplined. The toughest. The most controlled. The one who was perfectly equipped for any emergency.


The Roman soldier had a shield. And in certain situations, he and the men with him, would use their shields to create a formation known in Latin as the “testudo.” In English, this word is translated as “tortoise.” Because that’s what it was. The Roman legionaries would make a square, and each man would overlap his shield with the shield of the man next to him. This was done on the front, and all four sides. The men in the centre would hold their shields above their heads, thus protecting those around them. And suddenly, a collection of legionaries became an immovable object.

But it didn’t end there. You see, the men in front would now stick their spears out, and the entire testudo would advance. Because you see, brethren and sisters, what everyone forgets about the immovable object is that just because nothing can move it, does not mean that it can’t move – when it wants to.

And when an immovable object begins to move, it becomes an irresistible force. In our case, a force for good.

And a force for God.

A force that cannot be shaken from its path. A group of brethren and sisters who - slowly but surely - will make their way into the gates of Christ’s kingdom.
 
Download BRE - it's FREE

 

Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Revelation 22v14