Bible Truth Discussion Forum: Abomination Of Desolations/prophecy - Bible Truth Discussion Forum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Abomination Of Desolations/prophecy Matthew 24: 15, Daniel 9: 24-27 Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   firstthings1st. 

  • Alpha
  • Pip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 14-March 05

Post icon  Posted 19 March 2005 - 10:05 PM

Well hello! , and how are you'll doing on this blessed day? but do reply: as to the subject matter, but as to whether or not has this event happened or as to your views when is this event going to happen? ,

and how is it going to affect the nations around th world, or has it started as of yet?
but here are a few views to begin with if interested:

Abomination of Desolation/ Matthew 24: 15, Daniel 9: 24-27.

Jesus Christ - Yeshua Ha-Moshiach - also spoke of these final, frentic, tormenting, tremulous times. Looking into the future which will occur just before His Second Coming, He declared: "So when you see standing in the holy place 'the abomimation that causes desolation,' spoken of through the Prophet Daniel-let the reader understand-then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains...How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! Pray that your flight will not take place in winter or on the Sabbath. For then there will be GREAT DISTRESS, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now---and never to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut short {by the intervention and coming of the Messiah}, no one would survive {or be left alive on the planet earth}, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened" (Matt. 24:15-22).....Fr: the Prophecy Flash Magazine Titled: ..... 2012 and th END of DAYS Final Countdown to the Apocalypse? ..... /Vol. 18, No. 4 , Page # 4 ......


Triumph Prophetic Ministries P.O. Box 292, Altadena, CA. 91003/.... triumphpro@aol.com .... Sept.-Oct. 2004 ....William F. Dankenbring.....


triumphpro.com/ ....... end-of-days-and-final-countdown/

........but please look at on Page # 4 about 'the abomimation that causes desolation,'which are meaning of the same thing as Our Jesus Christ had said about in Matthew 24: 15 "Abomination of Desolation" concerning the Prophet Daniel in 9: 24-27. ....

abomination-desolation-hanukkah

If you would try to understand About just what is: ...... On this link below has to do with that inwhich Our Jesus Christ had said about in Matthew 24: 15 "Abomination of Desolation" concerning the Prophet Daniel in 9: 24-27. .... Fr. Walter Jr. and Debbie, La.

After the first link here are some views on: "The Abomination of Desolation", that was spoken of by Daniel The Prophet, ......now, who do understand exactly why was that statement made of our Lord in Matthew 24: 15, or do anyone even care anymore, but rightly dividing the words of this great Prophecy, which WILL SHORTLY OCCUR! , any views? .......Matthew 24: 15.

But! , on the first link below please scroll down to Definition # 26. for more views on: "The Abomination of Desolations" : .....

26. Abominations----things utterly repulsive according to the scriptures: A. descriptive of Egyptians eating with the Hebrews. B. Applied to perverse sexual relations. C. In ceremonial matters, applied. D. Sinfulness of men in. E. judgments manifested in. F. Things especially classed as silver or gold.

A Few issues on: ...... The Abomination of Desolation:

......


http://www.firstthin...om/custom2.html

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:4EF-M...ation&hl=en


http://google.com/custom?q=Matthew+24%3A+1...A1%3B&hl=en

Abomination+Of+Desolation: Fr: .... en.wikipedia.org/.........

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...n_of_desolation

Abomination: Fr: ....... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=...amp;sitesearch=.....

Desolation: Search/ Fr:........ http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?s...fulltext=Search

Definition of Desolation: ....... http://google.com/search?hl=en&oe=ISO-...ion&spell=1

Fr: ....... 4-12-05 .......

http://homewithgod.com/forum/showthread.ph...25070#post25070

love Fr: .....

This post has been edited by firstthings1st.: 30 January 2009 - 12:40 AM

Love you'll Fr: Walter, Jr. and Deborah, La. firstthings1st.com
0

#2 User is offline   Flappie 

  • The BTDF Team
  • View blog
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 11,094
  • Joined: 02-November 03

Posted 19 March 2005 - 10:11 PM

Erm, if you want to paste links, please use the "http://" button above the place where you write your post. It'd be a lot clearer then.

Thanks.
"I am Flappicus!"
"The first condition of immortality is death."
Broeders in Christus
0

#3 User is offline   CaptainCutshaw 

  • Tau
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Non-Member
  • Posts: 3,614
  • Joined: 11-March 04

Posted 19 March 2005 - 10:15 PM

I typed "http://" in front of most of the links. Looks better now. Please do this from now on firstthings1st.

Now I can start reading the post. :book:
0

#4 User is offline   Flappie 

  • The BTDF Team
  • View blog
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 11,094
  • Joined: 02-November 03

Posted 19 March 2005 - 10:20 PM

Yes, Matthew 24:15 has been fulfilled, when the Romans went a laid seige to Jerusalem.

This is what Fortigurn wrote recently about it:

Fortigurn, on Mar 3 2005, 09:08 AM, said:

This is how the warning and the time to flee goes as I see it:
  •   In AD 66, Cestius Gallus (governor of Syria), advances on Jerusalem, leading the Twelfth Legion.  He intends to take the city.


  •   On November 19 he tears through the suburbs, burning as he goes.  Jewish resistance is crushed, and he seizes control of the upper city.


  •   A band of Jews hold out against the Roman army, conducting their resistance from towers and behind city walls.


  •   A five day assault on the Jewish position fails to take it.  Gallus changes tactics and decides to take the temple in a flanking maneouvre.  The Roman soldiers are unable to break in, due to fierce Jewish resistance, but succeed in securing a position at the walls, which they then proceed to undermine by digging.  Josephus is our witness:

    Quote

    (535) Thus did the Romans make their attack against the wall for five days, but to no purpose.  But on the next day, Cestius took a great many of his choicest men, and with them the archers, and attempted to break into the temple at the northern quarter of it; (536) but the Jews beat them off from the cloisters, and repulsed them several times when they were gotten near to the wall, till at length the multitude of the darts cut them off, and made them retire; (537) but the first rank of the Romans rested their shields upon the wall, and so did those that were behind them, and the like did those that were still more backward, and guarded themselves with what they call Testudo, a tortoise, upon which the darts that were thrown fell, and slided off without doing them any harm; so the soldiers undermined the wall, without being themselves hurt, and got all things ready for setting fire to the gate of the temple.

    Josephus, 'Wars Of The Jews', Book II, chapter 19, section 5, paragraphs 535-537





  • At this point the Jews feared that the entire position was lost, given that the Romans were about to take the very temple:

    Quote

    (538) And now it was that a horrible fear seized upon the seditious, insomuch that many of them ran out of the city, as though it were to be taken immediately; but the people upon this took courage, and where the wicked part of the city gave ground, thither did they come, in order to set open the gates, and to admit Cestius as their benefactor, (539) who, had he but continued the siege a little longer, had certainly taken the city; but it was, I suppose, owing to the aversion God had already at the city and the sanctuary, that he was hindered from putting an end to the war that very day.

    Josephus, 'Wars Of The Jews', Book II, chapter 19, section 6, paragraphs 538-539





  • I am quoting from William Whiston's translation of Josephus (the definitive edition, published in 1736). At this place in Josephus from which I have quoted, Whiston (himself a Historicist), gives the following noteworthy comment:

    Quote

    There may another very important, and very providential, reason be here assigned for this strange and foolish retreat of Cestius; which, if Josephus had been now a Christian, he might probably have taken notice of also; and that is, the affording the Jewish Christians in the city an opportunity of calling to mind the prediction and caution given them by Christ about thirty-three years and a half before, that “then they should see the abomination of desolation”[the idolatrous Roman armies, with the images of their idols in their ensigns, ready to lay Jerusalem desolate,] “stand where it ought not;”or, “in the holy place;”or, “then they should see Jerusalem encompassed with armies,”they should then “flee to the mountains.”.

    By complying with which those Jewish Christians fled to the mountains of Perea, and escaped this destruction. See Lit. Accompl. of Proph. pp. 69–0. Nor was there, perhaps, any one instance of a more unpolitic, but more providential conduct than this retreat of Cestius, visible during this whole siege of Jerusalem; which yet was providentially such a “great tribulation, as had not been from the beginning of the world to that time; no, nor ever should be.” Ibid., pp. 70–1.





  • Whiston's comment here is very sound. The fact of the matter is that at this point - when he was at the very doors of the Temple, and was in the process of undermining the walls so that they would fall - that Gallus unaccountably withdrew:

    Quote

    (540) It then happened that Cestius was not conscious either how the besieged despaired of success, nor how courageous the people were for him; and so he recalled his soldiers from the place, and by despairing of any expectation of taking it, without having received any disgrace, he retired from the city, without any reason in the world.

    Josephus, 'Wars Of The Jews', Book II, chapter 19, section 7, paragraph 540





  • Josephus notes that at this time many of the wealthier Jews fled the city:

    Quote

    (556) After this calamity had befallen Cestius, many of the most eminent of the Jews swam away from the city, as from a ship when it was going to sink; Costobarus, therefore, and Saul, who were brethren, together with Philip, the son of Jacimus, who was the commander of king Agrippa’ forces, ran away from the city, and went to Cestius.

    Josephus, 'Wars Of The Jews', Book II, chapter 20, section 1, paragraph 556





  • These events match the description of events found in the Olivet prophecy, as Whiston demonstrates. But why would such a warning be given by Christ? Why warn of this particular event? The reason is that it was at this point, the defeat of Cestius Gallus, that the majority of the Jews became convinced that Jerusalem would never fall, as Josephus himself records:

    Quote

    (24) But, upon his coming and fighting, he was beaten, and a great many of those that were with him fell; and this disgrace which Gessius [with Cestius] received, became the calamity of our whole nation; for those that were fond of the war were so far elevated with this success, that they had hopes of finally conquering the Romans.

    Josephus, 'The Life Of Flavius Josephus', section 4, paragraph 24


    Such a warning as that given by Christ was entirely appropriate to this situation - only those heeding the warning he gave would have fled the city, rather than be taken in by the apparent invincibility of Jerusalem.



The holy place is NOT the temple, as the temple was destroyed a few years later, and it was also one of the last things they destroyed in Jerusalem, so noone would have had time to flee if the temple was meant.

This post has been edited by Flappie: 19 March 2005 - 10:22 PM

"I am Flappicus!"
"The first condition of immortality is death."
Broeders in Christus
0

#5 User is offline   firstthings1st. 

  • Alpha
  • Pip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 14-March 05

Posted 30 January 2009 - 12:52 AM

View PostCaptainCutshaw, on Mar 19 2005, 10:15 PM, said:

I typed "http://" in front of most of the links. Looks better now. Please do this from now on firstthings1st.

Now I can start reading the post. :book:


Ok! , I just noticed it, and thanks a lot.

This post has been edited by firstthings1st.: 30 January 2009 - 12:53 AM

Love you'll Fr: Walter, Jr. and Deborah, La. firstthings1st.com
0

#6 User is offline   Hudders 

  • Omega
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 10,104
  • Joined: 29-August 03

Posted 30 January 2009 - 12:55 AM

You've only just noticed this four yours later? Captain Cutshaw doesnt come here anymore by the way. But welcome back. :)
0

#7 User is offline   Asyncritus 

  • Psi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 7,059
  • Joined: 18-March 04

Posted 30 January 2009 - 05:07 PM

The Holy Place

There are too many places to list where ‘the holy place occurs’.

However, it invariably means

1 The Holy of Holies, where the High Priest entered once a year on the Day of Atonement such as:

Le 16:2 And the LORD said unto Moses, Speak unto Aaron thy brother, that he come not at all times into the holy place within the vail before the mercy seat, which is upon the ark; that he die not: for I will appear in the cloud upon the mercy seat.

1Ki 8:10 And it came to pass, when the priests were come out of the holy place, that the cloud filled the house of the LORD,

2 The Holy Place which was Jerusalem:

Ps 46:4 There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High.

And was IN Jerusalem:

Heb 9:25 Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood...

3 And by extension, Jerusalem itself, which was the ‘Holy City’

Da 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.

Re 11:2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.
God, be merciful to me
The Sinner
0

#8 User is offline   Fortigurn 

  • Omega
  • View blog
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 45,017
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 30 January 2009 - 05:15 PM

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 01:07 AM, said:

Re 11:2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.


Clearly that isn't referring to 70 AD, since that's not what happened in 70 AD. In 70 AD the entire temple was utterly destroyed, not just the outer court.

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.
Miserere mei Deus,
Secundum magnam misericordiam tuam.
Et secundum multitudinem miserationum tuarum
dele iniquitatem meam.

______________________________________________________________________
I am a Christadelphian. Click here to see my confession of faith.
______________________________________________________________________
'Research' does not mean 'Google'. Looks like it's back to Google school for you.
______________________________________________________________________
Photos
Apologetics
0

#9 User is offline   Asyncritus 

  • Psi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 7,059
  • Joined: 18-March 04

Posted 30 January 2009 - 06:32 PM

Quote

Clearly that isn't referring to 70 AD, since that's not what happened in 70 AD. In 70 AD the entire temple was utterly destroyed, not just the outer court.


The closeness of the wording of Rev 11 to Lk 21 indicates that it was. Here are the two passages side by side:

24 ... and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.

2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.

The 42 months cannot be stretched into nearly 2000 years by any reputable method of exposition.

THEREFORE there must be a second treading down with a very limited duration that is being referred to.



We cannot insist on literality in the middle of a fairly symbolic prophecy. But in any case you are misreading the passage.

The 'outer court' could not be trodden down, because there was nothing in it to be trodden down. If it was the 'court of the Gentiles' , then it was Gentile anyway, and they had some interest in not treading it down.("King Herod had enclosed the outer court with colonnades and it was referred to as the Court of the Gentiles because the "gentiles" (non-Jews) were permitted to enter the Temple area."http://www.bible-history.com/jewishtemple/JEWISH_TEMPLEThe_Court_of_the_Gentiles.htm)

The symbology indicates that the only part of the Jewish holy things to survive, would be the Gentile part. How remarkable!

This post has been edited by Asyncritus: 30 January 2009 - 06:46 PM

God, be merciful to me
The Sinner
0

#10 User is offline   Asyncritus 

  • Psi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 7,059
  • Joined: 18-March 04

Posted 30 January 2009 - 06:42 PM

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.


Lk 21.27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.

They didn't.

This post has been edited by Asyncritus: 30 January 2009 - 06:47 PM

God, be merciful to me
The Sinner
0

#11 User is offline   firstthings1st. 

  • Alpha
  • Pip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 14-March 05

Post icon  Posted 30 January 2009 - 07:03 PM

View PostFortigurn, on Jan 30 2009, 05:15 PM, said:

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 01:07 AM, said:

Re 11:2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.


Clearly that isn't referring to 70 AD, since that's not what happened in 70 AD. In 70 AD the entire temple was utterly destroyed, not just the outer court.

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.


<P>Hello Fortigurn, and all but how are you? and about your reply posted above, did you read the below full article esp. where it has been quoted below about the title of Ariel Sharon’s Gamble? and are you aware of its context happenings?


Ariel Sharon’s Gamble:


Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel, whom I have referred to as “God’s Bulldozer,” in the past, has had a strategy in mind for dealing with the Palestinians, and hopefully, to bring peace to the Middle East. Whether he knows it or not, He has been USED by God to achieve God’s purposes in the region, and to fulfill prophecy!



Sharon has been plunging down the “Road Map to Peace,” outlined by President George Bush, and backed up by the European Union, Russia, and the United Nations. Pulling Jewish settlers out of the Gaza strip was just the beginning. In doing this, he was losing the support of his own party, the Likkud. So he resigned from that political party, which he was instrumental in founding in 1973, and has formed his own new party, called “Kadima.” Many members of the Labor party, and unhappy members of the Likkud, have joined with him, including Shimon Peres. New elections will take place toward the end of March, 2006.



Sharon intended to fully support George Bush’s “Road Map” and to pull Israel out of much of the land of Judea and Samaria (the “West Bank” of the Jordan river). This will please world leaders and the United States and placate world opinion somewhat.



Sharon was willing to give up 90 percent of the West Bank, allow a Palestinian state to be formed on Israel’s borders, and seemingly wants to retain Jerusalem and Jewish settlements under Israeli sovereignty. However, there appears to be a secret agenda at work, where Jerusalem’s holy places may be placed under the jurisdiction of the Vatican, or some sort of divided authority. These negotiations, whether Sharon realized it or not, will lead to the Jews being allowed to rebuild the Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem!



But with his recent devastating strokes, Sharon has been taken out of the picture. The future of the Kadima party is in limbo and its survival in great doubt. Benjamin Netanyahu may well become the next Israeli Prime Minister! Will he follow in the footsteps of Arik Sharon? He has been moving more to the “center” in Israeli politics, to cull more votes. He has had experience, is a former Prime Minister, and is probably going to become the next one. It is very likely he, too, will follow the “roadmap to peace” or some version thereof, in order to please the United States and reach an accommodation n the Middle East viz a viz the Palestinian state.



Notice what Bible prophecy says on this issue!



Prophesied – a Jerusalem DIVIDED!


Although Sharon said he intends to keep Jerusalem under Israeli jurisdiction, this may be only a ploy to keep Jewish voters pleased, until the final decision must be made. Netanyahu and Sharon are practical men – politicians – and not necessarily “devout.” They are not particularly religious men.



Yet Biblical prophecy says in two places that end-time Jerusalem is going to become DIVIDED!



In the book of Revelation, chapter 11, the apostle John, looking into our day, is sees a Temple existing in Jerusalem. He is told, “Come and measure the temple of God and the altar and those who worship there, but do not measure the court outside the temple; leave that out, for IT IS GIVEN TO THE NATIONS, and they will trample over the holy city for forty two months” (Rev.11:1-2, NRSV).



Also, in Zechariah’s prophecy in the Old Testament, God says, “For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city shall be taken and the houses looted and the women raped; HALF the city shall go into exile, but the rest of the people shall not be cut off from the city” (Zechariah 14:1-2).



In 1993, Shimon Peres, on behalf of Israel, made an agreement with the Vatican to give it control over the old city, East Jerusalem, and the Temple Mount. The Oslo Plan is to make Jerusalem an international city under the control of the Vatican. Moshe Katsav, the Israeli president, is currently negotiating to sell Mount Zion to the Vatican, which would include control over part of David’s tomb.



On February 15, 2000, Pope John Paul II signed a covenant with Palestinian Yasser Arafat calling for the internationalization of Jerusalem.



The Palestinians cry, “No Jerusalem, no peace.” The Palestinian Authority, European Union, United States, all want a city divided. Finance Minister Ehud Olmert, Sharon’s top deputy, has on more than one occasion said that Israel would have to relinquish the dream of an eternally united Jerusalem under Jewish sovereignty.



Today, Jerusalem is indeed disputed – the hottest issue on the table. It is a “bone of contention” to all the nations. Reuters News, of December 16, 2005, claims, “Half of Israelis favour deal on Jerusalem.” The Israelis themselves are equally divided, says the poll – 49% for and 49% against. The fate of Jerusalem has always been one of the toughest, thorniest problems facing any peace negotiations.



It appears very likely that some quid pro quo arrangement will be agreed upon by the nations to divide Jerusalem and the Temple Mount – whether all are in agreement to do this yet – or not. The Temple will be rebuilt, and part of the Temple Mount will be given to the control of the nations.



Despite the political turmoil, there are already far advanced preparations underway to restore the Temple services and rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. Over 200 priests are presently in training in Yeshivas in Jerusalem. Almost all the Temple implements have been fabricated, including the royal blue cloak of the high priest with the techelet blue dye from the marine snails used in ancient times. Ground penetrating radar is being used to locate the exact foundations of the Temple.<P>
and from your same quote below have you read this article about 70 ad?

<P>

View PostFortigurn, on Jan 30 2009, 05:15 PM, said:

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 01:07 AM, said:

Re 11:2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.


Clearly that isn't referring to 70 AD, since that's not what happened in 70 AD. In 70 AD the entire temple was utterly destroyed, not just the outer court.

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.


From this Below article:

<a href="http://www.triumphpro.com/end-of-days-and-final-countdown.htm"> 2012 and the

“END OF DAYS” The Final Countdown to the Messiah? </a>


Understood by the Ancients:


The knowledge of God’s 7000-year Plan is not a new revelation from God to His Church during this End-Time age. In fact, this prophetic knowledge was known and understood by the early Church of God, during the first century and thereafter.



Says the New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge:



“The early fathers most commonly looked for the second advent at

the end of 6000 years of the world’s history” (vol.VII, p.376).



The Epistle of Barnabas, written about 200 A.D., actually expounded on the concept of the 7000-year plan of God, stating that the “end” would occur at the point of 6000 years from the creation of mankind. States this ancient document of the early church period:



“Of the Sabbath He speaketh in the beginning of the creation; ‘And God

made the works of his hands in six days, and He ended on the seventh

day, and rested on it, and He hallowed it.’ Give heed, children, what

this meaneth, ‘He ended in six days.’ He meaneth this, that IN SIX

THOUSAND YEARS THE LORD SHALL BRING ALL THINGS

TO AN END; for the day with Him signifieth a thousand years; and

this He himself beareth me witness, saying, ‘Behold, the day of the

Lord shall be as a THOUSAND YEARS.’ Therefore, children, in six

days, that is in six thousand years, everything shall come to an end.

‘And He rested on the seventh day.’ This he meaneth; when His Son

shall come, and shall abolish the time of the Lawless One, and shall

judge the ungodly, and shall change the sun and the moon and the stars,

then shall He truly rest on the seventh day” (Epistle of Barnabus, chap.

15, The Apostolic Fathers, pp.151-152).



Early Christians expected the age of mankind’s self rule to come to an end, to be replaced by the Messianic Kingdom, after a period of 6,000 years. The “Epistle of Barnabus” bears eloquent testimony to this historical fact.



Irenaeus, who lived from A.D. 120 to 202, was a disciple of Polycarp, one of God’s true servants in Asia Minor, who himself was a disciple of the apostle John. Polycarp sent Pothus into Celtic Gaul at an early date to establish the region, and he settled in Lyons, when Irenaeus joined him, having been his fellow-pupil under Polycarp. In his battle against raging heresies which were inundating the church at that time, Irenaeus wrote his Against Heresies. In book 1, chapter xxviii, 3, we read:



“For in as many days as this world was made, in so many thousand

years shall it be concluded. And for this reason the Scripture says:

‘Thus the heaven and the earth were finished, and all their adornment.

And God brought to a conclusion upon the sixth day the works that

He had made; and God rested upon the seventh day from all His works.’

This is an account of the things formerly created, as also it is a prophecy

of what is to come. For the day of the Lord is as a thousand years; and

in six days created things were completed: it is evident, therefore, that

they will come to and END at the sixth thousand year” (Ante-Nicene

Fathers, vol.1, p.557).

Before the time of Christ, the Jews also understood that the Messiah would come after 6000 years of human history.



The Encyclopedia Britannica, eleventh edition, concerning the Talmud, states:



“The view most frequently expressed there . . . is that the Messianic

kingdom will last for one thousand (some said two thousand) years.

‘In six days God created the world, on the seventh He rested. But a

day of God is equal to a thousand years (Ps.90:4). Hence the WORLD

WILL LAST FOR SIX THOUSAND YEARS of toil and labor; then

will come one thousand years of Sabbath rest for the people of God in

the kingdom of the Messiah.’ This idea must have already been very

common in the first century before Christ” (“Millennium,” p.459).



The Jewish Encyclopedia goes into greater detail:



“The Perso-Babylonian world-year of twelve millenniums, however,

was transformed in Jewish eschatology into a world-week of seven

millenniums corresponding with the week of Creation. The verse,

‘A thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday’ (Ps.90:4) having

suggested the idea that the present world of toil is to be followed by

a Sabbatical millennium, ‘the world to come.’ Of these the six

millenniums were again divided, as in Parsism, into three periods: the

first 2000 years devoid of the law; the next 2000 years under the rule of

the law; and the last 2000 years preparing amid struggles and through

catastrophes for the rule of the Messiah” (“Eschatology,” The Jewish

Encyclopedia, V, p.211).



The “Messianic Era,” then, is the last 2,000 years of the cycle.



David Stern, in the Jewish New Testament Commentary, explains the deep roots of the six thousand year plan of God in ancient Judaism. In his commentary on II Peter, chapter 3:8-10, and the “day is a thousand year” principle, Stern writes:



“This idea, taken from Psalm 90:4 . . . has deep roots in Judaism, specifically in connection with dating the Messianic Era. A famous example is found in the Talmud, in Tractate Sanhedrin:



‘Rav Kattina said, “The world will exist for six thousand years, then for one

thousand it will be desolate, as it is said, ‘The Lord alone will be exalted in

that day’” (Isaiah 2:11). . . .



‘It has been taught in accordance with Rav Kattina, “Just as every seventh

year is a year of sh’mittah [letting the land lie fallow], so it is with the world:

one thousand years out of seven are to be fallow – as proved by the following

three texts taken together [in which the key word is “day”]: ‘The Lord alone

will be exalted in that day’ (Isa.2:11); ‘A psalm and song for the day of Shabbat’ (Psalm 91:1), meaning the day that is entirely Shabbat; and, ‘For a thousand years in your sight are but as yesterday when it is past’” (Psalm 90:4).

‘The school of Eliyahu [Elijah] teaches: “The world exists for six thousand

years – two thousand of them tohu [“void”]; two thousand, Torah; and two

thousand, the era of the Messiah. But because of our numerous iniquities

many of these years have been lost”’ (Sanhedrin 97a-97b).



Says Stern, “According to Jewish tradition, there were 2,000 years without Torah – spiritual tohu – between the creation of Adam and the time when Abraham, aged 52, began convincing people to worship the one true God.



“The second 2,000 years supposedly lasted from then until 172 years after the construction of the second Temple, that is, until 244 C.E. That was the year 4000 by the Jewish calendar, but no significant event in Jewish history took place then. However, biblical chronology has a number of uncertainties, so that not all agree that the Jewish calendar accurately dates the biblical beginning of creation. James Ussher, archbishop of Armagh, Ireland, writing in the 17th century, placed the creation according to Genesis at 4004 B.C.E., exactly 4000 years before Yeshua’s supposed birthdate.”



Stern goes on:



“Concerning the third 2,000 years, a footnote to this passage in the Soncino

English edition of the Talmud says, ‘Messiah will come within that period.

He should have come at the beginning of [it]; the delay is due to our sins.’

It should be obvious that the Messiah who ‘should have come at the beginning’

of the last 2,000-year period is in fact Yeshua, who did come then. The delay

is not of his coming but of our recognizing him, and this delay is indeed ‘due

to our sins’ . . .



“Yet, as Kefa [Peter] points out, there is a delay in his second coming; and

this is, in a different sense, ‘due to our sins’: The Lord is not slow in keeping

his promise . . . ; on the contrary, he is patient with you; for it is . . . his

purpose that everyone should turn back from his sins, literally, ‘that every-

one should come to repentance’ . . . .” (Jewish New Testament Commentary,

page 763-764).



Revising Chronology


David Stern said the Jews believe the second 2,000 year period supposedly lasted from Abraham, age 52, until 172 years after the destruction of the second Temple, that is, the year 244 A.D. (or C.E. as scholars put it, for “Common Era”). This, he says, was their year 4,000 from creation. This Jewish belief, however, is mistaken on many points. Supposedly, their calendar begins in 3760 B.C. Four thousand years from then would be:



4000

-3760 B.C.

240

+l (no year zero)

241 A.D.



Thus even from their own creation date, 4000 years would end in 241 A.D. – not 244 A.D. Secondly, the second Temple was destroyed by the Romans in 70 A.D. Add 172 years after the destruction of the second temple would bring us to 242 A.D. – still off by two years from 244 A.D.



Truly, however, nothing significant in Jewish history happened in any of those years! Either the prophecy was wrong – or they were wrong! The truth is, their calendar, which dates creation in 3760 B.C., begins 244 years after the true date of creation – 4004 B.C.



Calculating 4,000 years from the Biblical date of Creation, as shown in the Bible and by archbishop Ussher, the terminus would be 4 B.C. – the very year of the birth of Jesus Christ! (See our article, “When Was Jesus Born?”).



This also ties in with Abraham’s birth. The book of Jasher shows that he was born in 2056 B.C., so he would have been 52 years of age in precisely 2004 B.C. Dating the second period of 2,000 years from that time, when Torah began to be taught by Abraham, brings us to exactly 4 B.C. – the year of Messiah’s birth!

This post has been edited by firstthings1st.: 30 January 2009 - 07:42 PM

Love you'll Fr: Walter, Jr. and Deborah, La. firstthings1st.com
0

#12 User is offline   Fortigurn 

  • Omega
  • View blog
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 45,017
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 30 January 2009 - 11:09 PM

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 02:42 AM, said:

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.


Lk 21.27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.

They didn't.


That isn't evidence of a dual fulfillment.
Miserere mei Deus,
Secundum magnam misericordiam tuam.
Et secundum multitudinem miserationum tuarum
dele iniquitatem meam.

______________________________________________________________________
I am a Christadelphian. Click here to see my confession of faith.
______________________________________________________________________
'Research' does not mean 'Google'. Looks like it's back to Google school for you.
______________________________________________________________________
Photos
Apologetics
0

#13 User is offline   Jon D 

  • Pi
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: BTDF MD
  • Posts: 764
  • Joined: 13-September 06

Posted 30 January 2009 - 11:34 PM

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 30 2009, 06:42 PM, said:

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.


Lk 21.27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.

They didn't.


Asy,

Yup, the disciples didn't see it directly because they'd done as Christ had commanded, they had fled. Note that the pronouns have changed:

Quote

And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh...and they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled...And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh...Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.


So, whatever the Son of Man coming is, it is in the disciples lifetime. The "they" are explained by Christ:

"Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven." (Matt 26 vs. 64)

The "they" are the Sanhedrin.
Even so, come, Lord Jesus
0

#14 User is offline   Asyncritus 

  • Psi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 7,059
  • Joined: 18-March 04

Posted 31 January 2009 - 12:26 AM

Elimelech

Well, you've really got me there.

Are you saying that the Son of Man came in AD70?

If so, where is He now?

But let me make sure I've got this right:

And when ye [my disciples] shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh...and they [the sanhedrin?] shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations:

and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled...[ when was that fulfilled?]

And then shall they [the Sanhedrin?] see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.

And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads [my disciples]; for your redemption draweth nigh...Verily I say unto you, This generation [ = the Sanhedrin?] shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.

Can you clarify this a little and indicate where that version of things is right or wrong?

I'm impressed with your observation, and agree with you that the change from ye to they is important and significant. But what if ye = my disciples (1stC) ] and they = my disciples in the 21st?
God, be merciful to me
The Sinner
0

#15 User is offline   Asyncritus 

  • Psi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 7,059
  • Joined: 18-March 04

Posted 31 January 2009 - 12:28 AM

View PostFortigurn, on Jan 30 2009, 11:09 PM, said:

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 02:42 AM, said:

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.


Lk 21.27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.

They didn't.


That isn't evidence of a dual fulfillment.


Then what is it evidence of? A non-fulfilment?
God, be merciful to me
The Sinner
0

#16 User is offline   Matt Smith 

  • Phi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: On Vacation
  • Posts: 5,568
  • Joined: 31-December 02

Posted 31 January 2009 - 12:34 AM

This section of the forum is NOT for debate. Please take it to Mars Hill.....
Matt Smith
cdelph.org

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
0

#17 User is offline   Fortigurn 

  • Omega
  • View blog
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 45,017
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 31 January 2009 - 03:41 AM

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 08:28 AM, said:

Then what is it evidence of? A non-fulfilment?


No, that's the logical fallacy of the false dichotomy. My understanding of the Olivet prophecy is here.
Miserere mei Deus,
Secundum magnam misericordiam tuam.
Et secundum multitudinem miserationum tuarum
dele iniquitatem meam.

______________________________________________________________________
I am a Christadelphian. Click here to see my confession of faith.
______________________________________________________________________
'Research' does not mean 'Google'. Looks like it's back to Google school for you.
______________________________________________________________________
Photos
Apologetics
0

#18 User is offline   Asyncritus 

  • Psi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 7,059
  • Joined: 18-March 04

Posted 31 January 2009 - 11:33 AM

I've read your article in which you say that your view of the Olivet Prophecy is expressed.

I see there about 20(?) authors' opinions, but can't make out your own.


???

The headlines will do nicely thanks.
God, be merciful to me
The Sinner
0

#19 User is offline   Fortigurn 

  • Omega
  • View blog
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 45,017
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 31 January 2009 - 01:34 PM

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 07:33 PM, said:

I've read your article in which you say that your view of the Olivet Prophecy is expressed.

I see there about 20(?) authors' opinions, but can't make out your own.
.

It's there, read it.
Miserere mei Deus,
Secundum magnam misericordiam tuam.
Et secundum multitudinem miserationum tuarum
dele iniquitatem meam.

______________________________________________________________________
I am a Christadelphian. Click here to see my confession of faith.
______________________________________________________________________
'Research' does not mean 'Google'. Looks like it's back to Google school for you.
______________________________________________________________________
Photos
Apologetics
0

#20 User is offline   bibleman46 

  • Beta
  • Pip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 26-January 09

Posted 31 January 2009 - 05:45 PM

View Postfirstthings1st., on Jan 30 2009, 01:03 PM, said:

View PostFortigurn, on Jan 30 2009, 05:15 PM, said:

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 01:07 AM, said:

Re 11:2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.


Clearly that isn't referring to 70 AD, since that's not what happened in 70 AD. In 70 AD the entire temple was utterly destroyed, not just the outer court.

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.


<P>Hello Fortigurn, and all but how are you? and about your reply posted above, did you read the below full article esp. where it has been quoted below about the title of Ariel Sharon’s Gamble? and are you aware of its context happenings?


Ariel Sharon’s Gamble:


Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel, whom I have referred to as “God’s Bulldozer,” in the past, has had a strategy in mind for dealing with the Palestinians, and hopefully, to bring peace to the Middle East. Whether he knows it or not, He has been USED by God to achieve God’s purposes in the region, and to fulfill prophecy!



Sharon has been plunging down the “Road Map to Peace,” outlined by President George Bush, and backed up by the European Union, Russia, and the United Nations. Pulling Jewish settlers out of the Gaza strip was just the beginning. In doing this, he was losing the support of his own party, the Likkud. So he resigned from that political party, which he was instrumental in founding in 1973, and has formed his own new party, called “Kadima.” Many members of the Labor party, and unhappy members of the Likkud, have joined with him, including Shimon Peres. New elections will take place toward the end of March, 2006.



Sharon intended to fully support George Bush’s “Road Map” and to pull Israel out of much of the land of Judea and Samaria (the “West Bank” of the Jordan river). This will please world leaders and the United States and placate world opinion somewhat.



Sharon was willing to give up 90 percent of the West Bank, allow a Palestinian state to be formed on Israel’s borders, and seemingly wants to retain Jerusalem and Jewish settlements under Israeli sovereignty. However, there appears to be a secret agenda at work, where Jerusalem’s holy places may be placed under the jurisdiction of the Vatican, or some sort of divided authority. These negotiations, whether Sharon realized it or not, will lead to the Jews being allowed to rebuild the Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem!



But with his recent devastating strokes, Sharon has been taken out of the picture. The future of the Kadima party is in limbo and its survival in great doubt. Benjamin Netanyahu may well become the next Israeli Prime Minister! Will he follow in the footsteps of Arik Sharon? He has been moving more to the “center” in Israeli politics, to cull more votes. He has had experience, is a former Prime Minister, and is probably going to become the next one. It is very likely he, too, will follow the “roadmap to peace” or some version thereof, in order to please the United States and reach an accommodation n the Middle East viz a viz the Palestinian state.



Notice what Bible prophecy says on this issue!



Prophesied – a Jerusalem DIVIDED!


Although Sharon said he intends to keep Jerusalem under Israeli jurisdiction, this may be only a ploy to keep Jewish voters pleased, until the final decision must be made. Netanyahu and Sharon are practical men – politicians – and not necessarily “devout.” They are not particularly religious men.



Yet Biblical prophecy says in two places that end-time Jerusalem is going to become DIVIDED!



In the book of Revelation, chapter 11, the apostle John, looking into our day, is sees a Temple existing in Jerusalem. He is told, “Come and measure the temple of God and the altar and those who worship there, but do not measure the court outside the temple; leave that out, for IT IS GIVEN TO THE NATIONS, and they will trample over the holy city for forty two months” (Rev.11:1-2, NRSV).



Also, in Zechariah’s prophecy in the Old Testament, God says, “For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city shall be taken and the houses looted and the women raped; HALF the city shall go into exile, but the rest of the people shall not be cut off from the city” (Zechariah 14:1-2).



In 1993, Shimon Peres, on behalf of Israel, made an agreement with the Vatican to give it control over the old city, East Jerusalem, and the Temple Mount. The Oslo Plan is to make Jerusalem an international city under the control of the Vatican. Moshe Katsav, the Israeli president, is currently negotiating to sell Mount Zion to the Vatican, which would include control over part of David’s tomb.



On February 15, 2000, Pope John Paul II signed a covenant with Palestinian Yasser Arafat calling for the internationalization of Jerusalem.



The Palestinians cry, “No Jerusalem, no peace.” The Palestinian Authority, European Union, United States, all want a city divided. Finance Minister Ehud Olmert, Sharon’s top deputy, has on more than one occasion said that Israel would have to relinquish the dream of an eternally united Jerusalem under Jewish sovereignty.



Today, Jerusalem is indeed disputed – the hottest issue on the table. It is a “bone of contention” to all the nations. Reuters News, of December 16, 2005, claims, “Half of Israelis favour deal on Jerusalem.” The Israelis themselves are equally divided, says the poll – 49% for and 49% against. The fate of Jerusalem has always been one of the toughest, thorniest problems facing any peace negotiations.



It appears very likely that some quid pro quo arrangement will be agreed upon by the nations to divide Jerusalem and the Temple Mount – whether all are in agreement to do this yet – or not. The Temple will be rebuilt, and part of the Temple Mount will be given to the control of the nations.



Despite the political turmoil, there are already far advanced preparations underway to restore the Temple services and rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. Over 200 priests are presently in training in Yeshivas in Jerusalem. Almost all the Temple implements have been fabricated, including the royal blue cloak of the high priest with the techelet blue dye from the marine snails used in ancient times. Ground penetrating radar is being used to locate the exact foundations of the Temple.<P>
and from your same quote below have you read this article about 70 ad?

<P>

View PostFortigurn, on Jan 30 2009, 05:15 PM, said:

View PostAsyncritus, on Jan 31 2009, 01:07 AM, said:

Re 11:2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.


Clearly that isn't referring to 70 AD, since that's not what happened in 70 AD. In 70 AD the entire temple was utterly destroyed, not just the outer court.

Quote

The Olivet prophecy is one with dual fulfilments. It was fulfilled UP TO A POINT in AD70, but the final and full fulfilment is yet to come.


Proof please.


From this Below article:

<a href="http://www.triumphpro.com/end-of-days-and-final-countdown.htm"> 2012 and the

“END OF DAYS” The Final Countdown to the Messiah? </a>


Understood by the Ancients:


The knowledge of God’s 7000-year Plan is not a new revelation from God to His Church during this End-Time age. In fact, this prophetic knowledge was known and understood by the early Church of God, during the first century and thereafter.



Says the New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge:



“The early fathers most commonly looked for the second advent at

the end of 6000 years of the world’s history” (vol.VII, p.376).



The Epistle of Barnabas, written about 200 A.D., actually expounded on the concept of the 7000-year plan of God, stating that the “end” would occur at the point of 6000 years from the creation of mankind. States this ancient document of the early church period:



“Of the Sabbath He speaketh in the beginning of the creation; ‘And God

made the works of his hands in six days, and He ended on the seventh

day, and rested on it, and He hallowed it.’ Give heed, children, what

this meaneth, ‘He ended in six days.’ He meaneth this, that IN SIX

THOUSAND YEARS THE LORD SHALL BRING ALL THINGS

TO AN END; for the day with Him signifieth a thousand years; and

this He himself beareth me witness, saying, ‘Behold, the day of the

Lord shall be as a THOUSAND YEARS.’ Therefore, children, in six

days, that is in six thousand years, everything shall come to an end.

‘And He rested on the seventh day.’ This he meaneth; when His Son

shall come, and shall abolish the time of the Lawless One, and shall

judge the ungodly, and shall change the sun and the moon and the stars,

then shall He truly rest on the seventh day” (Epistle of Barnabus, chap.

15, The Apostolic Fathers, pp.151-152).



Early Christians expected the age of mankind’s self rule to come to an end, to be replaced by the Messianic Kingdom, after a period of 6,000 years. The “Epistle of Barnabus” bears eloquent testimony to this historical fact.



Irenaeus, who lived from A.D. 120 to 202, was a disciple of Polycarp, one of God’s true servants in Asia Minor, who himself was a disciple of the apostle John. Polycarp sent Pothus into Celtic Gaul at an early date to establish the region, and he settled in Lyons, when Irenaeus joined him, having been his fellow-pupil under Polycarp. In his battle against raging heresies which were inundating the church at that time, Irenaeus wrote his Against Heresies. In book 1, chapter xxviii, 3, we read:



“For in as many days as this world was made, in so many thousand

years shall it be concluded. And for this reason the Scripture says:

‘Thus the heaven and the earth were finished, and all their adornment.

And God brought to a conclusion upon the sixth day the works that

He had made; and God rested upon the seventh day from all His works.’

This is an account of the things formerly created, as also it is a prophecy

of what is to come. For the day of the Lord is as a thousand years; and

in six days created things were completed: it is evident, therefore, that

they will come to and END at the sixth thousand year” (Ante-Nicene

Fathers, vol.1, p.557).

Before the time of Christ, the Jews also understood that the Messiah would come after 6000 years of human history.



The Encyclopedia Britannica, eleventh edition, concerning the Talmud, states:



“The view most frequently expressed there . . . is that the Messianic

kingdom will last for one thousand (some said two thousand) years.

‘In six days God created the world, on the seventh He rested. But a

day of God is equal to a thousand years (Ps.90:4). Hence the WORLD

WILL LAST FOR SIX THOUSAND YEARS of toil and labor; then

will come one thousand years of Sabbath rest for the people of God in

the kingdom of the Messiah.’ This idea must have already been very

common in the first century before Christ” (“Millennium,” p.459).



The Jewish Encyclopedia goes into greater detail:



“The Perso-Babylonian world-year of twelve millenniums, however,

was transformed in Jewish eschatology into a world-week of seven

millenniums corresponding with the week of Creation. The verse,

‘A thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday’ (Ps.90:4) having

suggested the idea that the present world of toil is to be followed by

a Sabbatical millennium, ‘the world to come.’ Of these the six

millenniums were again divided, as in Parsism, into three periods: the

first 2000 years devoid of the law; the next 2000 years under the rule of

the law; and the last 2000 years preparing amid struggles and through

catastrophes for the rule of the Messiah” (“Eschatology,” The Jewish

Encyclopedia, V, p.211).



The “Messianic Era,” then, is the last 2,000 years of the cycle.



David Stern, in the Jewish New Testament Commentary, explains the deep roots of the six thousand year plan of God in ancient Judaism. In his commentary on II Peter, chapter 3:8-10, and the “day is a thousand year” principle, Stern writes:



“This idea, taken from Psalm 90:4 . . . has deep roots in Judaism, specifically in connection with dating the Messianic Era. A famous example is found in the Talmud, in Tractate Sanhedrin:



‘Rav Kattina said, “The world will exist for six thousand years, then for one

thousand it will be desolate, as it is said, ‘The Lord alone will be exalted in

that day’” (Isaiah 2:11). . . .



‘It has been taught in accordance with Rav Kattina, “Just as every seventh

year is a year of sh’mittah [letting the land lie fallow], so it is with the world:

one thousand years out of seven are to be fallow – as proved by the following

three texts taken together [in which the key word is “day”]: ‘The Lord alone

will be exalted in that day’ (Isa.2:11); ‘A psalm and song for the day of Shabbat’ (Psalm 91:1), meaning the day that is entirely Shabbat; and, ‘For a thousand years in your sight are but as yesterday when it is past’” (Psalm 90:4).

‘The school of Eliyahu [Elijah] teaches: “The world exists for six thousand

years – two thousand of them tohu [“void”]; two thousand, Torah; and two

thousand, the era of the Messiah. But because of our numerous iniquities

many of these years have been lost”’ (Sanhedrin 97a-97b).



Says Stern, “According to Jewish tradition, there were 2,000 years without Torah – spiritual tohu – between the creation of Adam and the time when Abraham, aged 52, began convincing people to worship the one true God.



“The second 2,000 years supposedly lasted from then until 172 years after the construction of the second Temple, that is, until 244 C.E. That was the year 4000 by the Jewish calendar, but no significant event in Jewish history took place then. However, biblical chronology has a number of uncertainties, so that not all agree that the Jewish calendar accurately dates the biblical beginning of creation. James Ussher, archbishop of Armagh, Ireland, writing in the 17th century, placed the creation according to Genesis at 4004 B.C.E., exactly 4000 years before Yeshua’s supposed birthdate.”



Stern goes on:



“Concerning the third 2,000 years, a footnote to this passage in the Soncino

English edition of the Talmud says, ‘Messiah will come within that period.

He should have come at the beginning of [it]; the delay is due to our sins.’

It should be obvious that the Messiah who ‘should have come at the beginning’

of the last 2,000-year period is in fact Yeshua, who did come then. The delay

is not of his coming but of our recognizing him, and this delay is indeed ‘due

to our sins’ . . .



“Yet, as Kefa [Peter] points out, there is a delay in his second coming; and

this is, in a different sense, ‘due to our sins’: The Lord is not slow in keeping

his promise . . . ; on the contrary, he is patient with you; for it is . . . his

purpose that everyone should turn back from his sins, literally, ‘that every-

one should come to repentance’ . . . .” (Jewish New Testament Commentary,

page 763-764).



Revising Chronology


David Stern said the Jews believe the second 2,000 year period supposedly lasted from Abraham, age 52, until 172 years after the destruction of the second Temple, that is, the year 244 A.D. (or C.E. as scholars put it, for “Common Era”). This, he says, was their year 4,000 from creation. This Jewish belief, however, is mistaken on many points. Supposedly, their calendar begins in 3760 B.C. Four thousand years from then would be:



4000

-3760 B.C.

240

+l (no year zero)

241 A.D.



Thus even from their own creation date, 4000 years would end in 241 A.D. – not 244 A.D. Secondly, the second Temple was destroyed by the Romans in 70 A.D. Add 172 years after the destruction of the second temple would bring us to 242 A.D. – still off by two years from 244 A.D.



Truly, however, nothing significant in Jewish history happened in any of those years! Either the prophecy was wrong – or they were wrong! The truth is, their calendar, which dates creation in 3760 B.C., begins 244 years after the true date of creation – 4004 B.C.



Calculating 4,000 years from the Biblical date of Creation, as shown in the Bible and by archbishop Ussher, the terminus would be 4 B.C. – the very year of the birth of Jesus Christ! (See our article, “When Was Jesus Born?”).



This also ties in with Abraham’s birth. The book of Jasher shows that he was born in 2056 B.C., so he would have been 52 years of age in precisely 2004 B.C. Dating the second period of 2,000 years from that time, when Torah began to be taught by Abraham, brings us to exactly 4 B.C. – the year of Messiah’s birth!

Hello there firstthingsfirst, I am not a student of prophecy, and only know a little about it, bt I do know that our Lord said in Matthew 24:36, "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels, but my Father only." Even in Mark 13:32 he explicitly states, "neither the Son", in a parallel passage . The point I'm trying to make is that if our Lord didn't know, and I'm sure he does now, but if these questions were asked then as now, could there be a subtle reason, say, "if I know, I'll get ready then" mentality? I think our concern should not be did it yet happen, when will it happen, but how can I get the good news out to the most people I can until it actually happenes. Unfortuantly for us, God did not use our calenders, He has His own, and all the chronoloical work we do, no matter how accurate we try tro be, it is still off. If I understand your post, and perhaps I don't, you're tryig to say that the end of the 6000 years is 2241/2? If this is true, then many people may get lazy with their efforts for salvation, and be lost if it is sooner, if not and it is truly 2241/2, then we have a long time to wait, which offers no hope. Jesus said in Acts, "it is not for you to know the times and seasons that are in the Fathers hands", so if Jesus told them, his most trusted Apostles, not to worry about it, but do as I say, preach, what are we doing trying to figure out twhen he will be back? Time is something that God has, not us. As One who is able to see the end from the beginning, I think it might be best to let Him figure out when He's set up His Kingdom, and how. I can honestly believe that in the end, when it's all over, and the kingdom is established and Christs rule is on it way, him telling us, "you know, you guys had it all wrong..." :confused:
Blessings, bibleman46.
0

#21 User is offline   Asyncritus 

  • Psi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 7,059
  • Joined: 18-March 04

Posted 31 January 2009 - 05:49 PM

If I have to read through about 10 short articles and not find your opinion, then that's too bad. A summary of your view, whatever it may be, at the end of them might not be a bad idea.

You are being coy? :curtain:

As I said, the headlines will do nicely, and won't take too long at your typing speed. Thanks in advance.
God, be merciful to me
The Sinner
0

#22 User is offline   Fortigurn 

  • Omega
  • View blog
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 45,017
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 01 February 2009 - 01:54 AM

View PostAsyncritus, on Feb 1 2009, 01:49 AM, said:

If I have to read through about 10 short articles and not find your opinion, then that's too bad.


You don't. It's in the first post in the thread to which I linked.

Quote

A summary of your view, whatever it may be, at the end of them might not be a bad idea.


It's in the first post in the thread to which I linked.

Quote

You are being coy? :curtain:


No. It's in the first post in the thread to which I linked.

Quote

As I said, the headlines will do nicely, and won't take too long at your typing speed. Thanks in advance.


It's in the first post in the thread to which I linked. You just don't bother reading anything I link to.
Miserere mei Deus,
Secundum magnam misericordiam tuam.
Et secundum multitudinem miserationum tuarum
dele iniquitatem meam.

______________________________________________________________________
I am a Christadelphian. Click here to see my confession of faith.
______________________________________________________________________
'Research' does not mean 'Google'. Looks like it's back to Google school for you.
______________________________________________________________________
Photos
Apologetics
0

#23 User is offline   Asyncritus 

  • Psi
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 7,059
  • Joined: 18-March 04

Posted 03 February 2009 - 12:13 AM

Erm, this doesn't sound like an expression of your opinion. You know, the usual way to do that is to say 'I think thus and so...' but that is completely absent from the record (i.e. the first post you referred to above, and which I quote in full here).

Quote

The natural reading of the Olivet prophecy is that the following events apply to AD 70:

* Warnings of persecution against the followers of Christ.

* Warnings of false prophets and false Christs, warnings of political upheaval and war.

* Jerusalem encompassed by armies.

* The people warned to flee Jerusalem.

* The Temple destroyed utterly.

* The Jews dispersed from their land into all nations for an unspecified duration of time.


So natural is this reading of the passage, that an alternative reading did not emerge until the end of the 16th century - over 1,500 years after AD 70.

In the next few posts, we'll consider various expositors who understood this passage as referring to AD 70. We shall consider how they felt it was fulfilled, and why they believed that it applied to AD 70.


Where does it say that this is your opinion and not merely a prelude to the collection of others' opinions? If it's there, then you certainly fooled me.

This post has been edited by Asyncritus: 03 February 2009 - 12:15 AM

God, be merciful to me
The Sinner
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users