He replied:
Quote
(1) by determining if they accept the Lordship of Jesus (1 Cor 12:3)
(2) by whether they acknowledge that Jesus Christ came in the flesh (1 John 4:1-2)
(3) for whether their message edifies and is an expression of love (1 Cor 14:1-19)
(4) i.e. whether it is "good" or "evil" (1 Thess 5:19-22)
(5) if their message is for "the common good" (1 Cor 12:7).
(2) by whether they acknowledge that Jesus Christ came in the flesh (1 John 4:1-2)
(3) for whether their message edifies and is an expression of love (1 Cor 14:1-19)
(4) i.e. whether it is "good" or "evil" (1 Thess 5:19-22)
(5) if their message is for "the common good" (1 Cor 12:7).
I agree with these criteria, even though I think that additional criteria ought to be added.
But let's just examine modern 'Holy Spirit' experiences in the light of these criteria.
1) All this writhing on the floor, laughing hysterically, shaking spasmodically, screaming incoherently, making animal noises and such like. What believers of Holy Spirit possession are pleased to call 'responses to the presence of the Lord'.
- Is it an acknowledgement of the Lordship of Christ? Not obviously. It doesn't direct anything towards him at all, least of all praise, honour, or glory.
- Is it an acknowledgement that Jesus Christ came in the flesh? By no means.
- Is it a message which edifies, or is an expression of love? Not at all - it's not even remotely intelligble.
- Is it for 'good' or 'evil'? Well, one could hardly say it is for good. It doesn't do any good at all, not for the individual, and least of all for the congregation. Is it evil? Well, even being very kind, one could only say that it's entirely useless.
- Is it a message for the common good? No - it's not a message at all. It doesn't even make any kind of sense. The wide variety of meanings and interpretations which have been placed on these manifestations demonstrate that there is no consensus on what these manifestations actually mean.
If there is a message, it has yet to be determined. Even the most optimistic believer can hardly claim that the common good has been addressed by them.
2) Speaking unintelligibly, gibbering senselessly, or gabbling meaninglessly. What believers of Holy Spirit possession are pleased to call 'speaking in tongues'.
- Is it an acknowledgement of the Lordship of Christ? Hardly. It's not even understandable.
It gives him no acknowledgement at all.
- Is it an acknowledgement that Jesus Christ came in the flesh? No. See above.
He isn't even mentioned by name.
- Is it a message which edifies, or is an expression of love? By no means. Since it cannot be understood, it can hardly edify or express anything comprehensible.
- Is it for 'good' or 'evil'? Well, to be fair, since what is spoken is never intelligible, the best one could say is that one would have to suspend judgement until the message was interpreted. Which it never is. I would say that if this wasn't exactly evil, it's very far from being good - it's completely useless.
- Is it a message for the common good? No. Never. But apparently this is fine with most believers in modern day 'speaking in tongues'. Apparently this is a personal, private manifestation of the spirit, for the personal and exclusive edification of the individual speaking. Which is so far removed from the Scriptural criteria, that it fails patently.
3) Feeling 'love', 'joy', 'a warm glow', 'tingling', 'happiness', or other pleasing emotions.
- Is it an acknowledgement of the Lordship of Christ? No. It doesn't communicate anything about his Lordship at all.
- Is it an acknowledgement that Jesus Christ came in the flesh? No. See above. He isn't even mentioned by name.
- Is it a message which edifies, or is an expression of love? Well, it certainly doesn't edify in the Scriptural sense, any more than seeing someone happy for normal reasons edifies in the Scriptural sense. Perhaps one could argue that it is an expression of love, but only of the individual for their God. Even this is stretching the point.
- Is it for 'good' or 'evil'? Well, it feels good for the individual concerned, but it doesn't go any further than that.
- Is it a message for the common good? It's not a message at all. Nothing is communicated. Someone just feels something. That's all.
Well, we can see that even by these criteria, modern 'Holy Spirit' manifestations fall very far short of being even remotely sanctioned by Scripture.


This topic is locked










