Jump to content


The Logic of Chance

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Kay



  • Admin
  • 5,993 posts

Posted 14 November 2011 - 05:14 AM

This is a copy of comment from UncommonDescent, which I thought of interest:

The origin of life is one of the hardest problems in all of science, but it is also one of the most important. Origin-of-live research has evolved into a lively, interdisciplinary field, but other scientists often view it with skepticism and even derision. This attitude is understandable and, in a sense, perhaps justified, given the “dirty” rarely mentioned secret: Despite many interesting results to its credit, when judged by the straightforward criterion of reaching (or even approaching) the ultimate goal, the origin of life field is a failure – we still do not have even a plausible coherent model, let alone a validated scenario, for the emergence of life on Earth. Certainly, this is due not to a lack of experimental and theoretical effort, but to the extraordinary intrinsic difficulty and complexity of the problem. A succession of exceedingly unlikely steps is essential for the origin of life, from the synthesis and accumulation of nucleotides to the origin of translation; through the multiplication of probabilities, these make the final outcome seem almost like a miracle.

- Eugene V. Koonin, molecular biologist, The Logic of Chance: The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution (Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press, 2011), 391

and if anyone wishes to follow it further.
"seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness" Matthew 6:33

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users